I am gettig better with discerning events in Regshot and Sanboxie to determine if something is portable and not, but the sheer weight and complexity of .net apps seem a bit more confusing.
I have to have .NET 2.0 for one of my office apps, so failure to run is not one of the choices I have, et I, like many here, still hearken for greater portability.
Does anyone have any rules of thumb for discerning if an app they encounter has dependencies on .net?
Thanks in advance,
Cornflower
Qn: How to tell if .NET is required
- Cornflower
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:58 am
- Location: Canada's capital
- Andrew Lee
- Posts: 3083
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
- Contact:
- Cornflower
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:58 am
- Location: Canada's capital
Thanks, both. I like Andrew's method better as I don't UPX except when I am cramming in, never on inspection.
Cornflower.
[quote="Andrew Lee"]Use [url=http://www.dependencywalker.com/]Dependency Walker[/url].
If it displays a dependency on MSCOREE.DLL, then it is a .NET EXE.[/quote]
Cornflower.
[quote="Andrew Lee"]Use [url=http://www.dependencywalker.com/]Dependency Walker[/url].
If it displays a dependency on MSCOREE.DLL, then it is a .NET EXE.[/quote]