Licenses by Name
Re: Licenses by Name
I should note that this is limited to licenses that are OSI-approved, which is obviously a lot but not comprehensive. I generally like using Wikipedia but there's also TLDR legal: https://tldrlegal.com/ (thanks SYSTEM).Wolfghost wrote:http://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical
I should note that whenever possible, I try to link to the developers' license. This is important for licenses that aren't labelled well or are are unique. A great example is the recent BSD license confusion on OW Shredder.
Re: Licenses by Name
Wikipedia wrote:The Wikimedia Foundation invites you to provide comments and feedback on upgrading the default license for text on the Wikimedia projects to Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0.