Page 1 of 1

HashMyFiles

Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:57 pm
by infimum
http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/hash_my_files.html

Since the "Checksum Calculators" area lacks a program that can handle unicode, this should be a good addition. It calculates MD5, SHA1, and CRC32.

Re: HashMyFiles

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:45 am
by guinness
V1.52 is available

Re: HashMyFiles

Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 7:11 am
by Checker
V1.55 is available :!:

Re: HashMyFiles

Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:10 am
by guinness

Re: HashMyFiles

Posted: Mon May 25, 2015 1:48 pm
by webfork
A lot has changed about this program since the last time I tested it including more SHA hashes and VirusTotal submission, bringing it line with other similar programs here on the site. I like it. Program entry and screenshot have been updated.

Re: HashMyFiles

Posted: Mon May 25, 2015 10:23 pm
by joby_toss
It's my preciousss! :)

Re: HashMyFiles

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 12:59 am
by siegfried
Wouldn't it be time to implement Blake2b? It's faster e more secure:
https://blake2.net/

Re: HashMyFiles

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 3:34 am
by Midas
siegfried wrote: time to implement Blake2b? It's faster e more secure: https://blake2.net/
While I agree on principle, let it be noted that the same applies to most hashers posted at TPFC.

Re: HashMyFiles

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 7:08 am
by siegfried
Midas wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 3:34 am let it be noted that the same applies to most hashers posted at TPFC.
Yes, you're right.

Re: HashMyFiles

Posted: Wed May 22, 2019 4:36 pm
by webfork
siegfried wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 12:59 am Wouldn't it be time to implement Blake2b? It's faster e more secure:
https://blake2.net/
I'm impressed that it's faster than MD5, but I wonder how it performs with something other than modern processors. As BLAKE was written specifically for those toolsets, older machines (especially 32-bit), cell phones, and anything with an ARM processor will likely not have that kind of speed.

Regardless, if I was going to run de-duplication on a large file collection, it seems like Blake would be the way to go. Also, if services like Virustotal start using it for file reputation, I think it would take off rapidly. However, for my own local file verification, I'll probably stick with CRC32 checks.

---

Related:
* Hashing use cases
* SHA1 Cracked?

Re: HashMyFiles

Posted: Wed May 22, 2019 6:59 pm
by SYSTEM
webfork wrote: Wed May 22, 2019 4:36 pm SHA1 Cracked?
SHA-1 has been subject to more attacks since then: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-1#The_SHAppening
Wikipedia wrote: The authors estimated that the cost of renting enough of EC2 CPU/GPU time to generate a full collision for SHA-1 at the time of publication was between US$75K–120K, and noted that was well within the budget of criminal organizations, not to mention national intelligence agencies. As such, the authors recommended that SHA-1 be deprecated as quickly as possible.
Of cource, no one is going to spend a hundred grand to compromise a random freeware program, so how much these attacks matter depend on what exactly SHA-1 is used for.