HashMyFiles

Submit portable freeware that you find here. It helps if you include information like description, extraction instruction, Unicode support, whether it writes to the registry, and so on.
Post Reply
Message
Author
infimum
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 1:00 am

HashMyFiles

#1 Post by infimum » Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:57 pm

http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/hash_my_files.html

Since the "Checksum Calculators" area lacks a program that can handle unicode, this should be a good addition. It calculates MD5, SHA1, and CRC32.

User avatar
guinness
Posts: 4118
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:00 am
Contact:

Re: HashMyFiles

#2 Post by guinness » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:45 am

V1.52 is available
Added 179 Applications: Portable

User avatar
Checker
Posts: 1624
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:00 pm
Location: Ingolstadt [DE]

Re: HashMyFiles

#3 Post by Checker » Sat Nov 14, 2009 7:11 am

V1.55 is available :!:

User avatar
guinness
Posts: 4118
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:00 am
Contact:

Re: HashMyFiles

#4 Post by guinness » Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:10 am

Added 179 Applications: Portable

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 8299
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: HashMyFiles

#5 Post by webfork » Mon May 25, 2015 1:48 pm

A lot has changed about this program since the last time I tested it including more SHA hashes and VirusTotal submission, bringing it line with other similar programs here on the site. I like it. Program entry and screenshot have been updated.

User avatar
joby_toss
Posts: 2902
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:57 am
Location: Romania
Contact:

Re: HashMyFiles

#6 Post by joby_toss » Mon May 25, 2015 10:23 pm

It's my preciousss! :)

siegfried
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:05 am

Re: HashMyFiles

#7 Post by siegfried » Wed May 15, 2019 12:59 am

Wouldn't it be time to implement Blake2b? It's faster e more secure:
https://blake2.net/

User avatar
Midas
Posts: 4573
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:09 am
Location: Sol3

Re: HashMyFiles

#8 Post by Midas » Wed May 15, 2019 3:34 am

siegfried wrote: time to implement Blake2b? It's faster e more secure: https://blake2.net/
While I agree on principle, let it be noted that the same applies to most hashers posted at TPFC.

siegfried
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:05 am

Re: HashMyFiles

#9 Post by siegfried » Thu May 16, 2019 7:08 am

Midas wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 3:34 am
let it be noted that the same applies to most hashers posted at TPFC.
Yes, you're right.

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 8299
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: HashMyFiles

#10 Post by webfork » Wed May 22, 2019 4:36 pm

siegfried wrote:
Wed May 15, 2019 12:59 am
Wouldn't it be time to implement Blake2b? It's faster e more secure:
https://blake2.net/
I'm impressed that it's faster than MD5, but I wonder how it performs with something other than modern processors. As BLAKE was written specifically for those toolsets, older machines (especially 32-bit), cell phones, and anything with an ARM processor will likely not have that kind of speed.

Regardless, if I was going to run de-duplication on a large file collection, it seems like Blake would be the way to go. Also, if services like Virustotal start using it for file reputation, I think it would take off rapidly. However, for my own local file verification, I'll probably stick with CRC32 checks.

---

Related:
* Hashing use cases
* SHA1 Cracked?

Post Reply