Page 2 of 6

Re: Portable Chromium

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:25 pm
by kAlug
There are some issues with that entry: I also think that the description could be changed to something like this:
Chromium Portable is a custom-built version of the dev channel of the Chromium web browser, optimized for portable use and packaged in the PortableApps.com Format. It also supports jPortable.

Re: Portable Chromium

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 3:40 pm
by webfork
kAlug wrote:The icon is wrong (this is the real one)
Although it looked the same, I went ahead and updated.
kAlug wrote:The license isn't FreeBSD (2-clause BSD); it's 3-clause BSD
Updated.
kAlug wrote:
SYSTEM wrote:(It seems -.- is the member who first mentioned Chromium: http://www.portablefreeware.com/forums/ ... 386#p14386)
Chromium Portable's first release was in the beginning of 2010, so -.- cannot be the first one to suggest it
I think he means the first person to point out the program here on PFWC.
kAlug wrote:I also think that the description could be changed to something like this:
Chromium Portable is a custom-built version of the dev channel of the Chromium web browser, optimized for portable use and packaged in the PortableApps.com Format. It also supports jPortable.
Updated.

Re: Portable Chromium

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:54 pm
by webfork

Re: Portable Chromium

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:59 pm
by SYSTEM
Thanks for the feedback, kAlug. And thanks for the improvements, webfork.
kAlug wrote:The icon is wrong (this is the real one)
I originally put the correct icon there. Checker changed it to a wrong one.
webfork wrote:
kAlug wrote:
SYSTEM wrote:(It seems -.- is the member who first mentioned Chromium: http://www.portablefreeware.com/forums/ ... 386#p14386)
Chromium Portable's first release was in the beginning of 2010, so -.- cannot be the first one to suggest it
I think he means the first person to point out the program here on PFWC.
We don't really have a policy about this.
The credit could go to the member (-.-) who first mentioned the base application (Chromium).
Or it could be given to the one (me) who first mentioned this particular portable version (Chromium Portable)

The choice doesn't matter much to me. I decided to give the credit to -.- so that I don't look like being selfish. :mrgreen:

Re: Chromium Portable (split from Pale Moon thread)

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:50 am
by guinness
so that I don't look like being selfish.
You could put -.- & SYSTEM so then everyone is a winner.

Re: Chromium Portable (split from Pale Moon thread)

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:36 am
by guinness
Changed the entry.

Re: Chromium Portable (split from Pale Moon thread)

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:42 am
by Checker
SYSTEM wrote:I originally put the correct icon there. Checker changed it to a wrong one.
You used the correct one. I tried to improve it, because it was a little bit fuzzy. I first used the Chromium icon, but than I saw, that Chromium Portable has an icon with an USB sign it it.
So I changed it to this ... it's the same you show here :wink:
webfork wrote:Although it looked the same, I went ahead and updated.
It was already changed to the correct one by me :)

Re: Chromium Portable (split from Pale Moon thread)

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:17 am
by guinness
What a subtle change with the icon, I wouldn't have noticed it :)

Re: Chromium Portable (split from Pale Moon thread)

Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 11:44 pm
by kAlug
Chromium Portable has been updated to 16.0.912.0. The latest version can now be downloaded from http://crportable.sourceforge.net/services/download/
The license for the whole package is a mix of BSD, GPL, LGPL, et al.; I believe you can describe it as GPL.

Re: Chromium Portable (split from Pale Moon thread)

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 8:48 am
by webfork
kAlug wrote:a mix of BSD, GPL, LGPL, et al.; I believe you can describe it as GPL.
That's my understanding as well. Entry updated.

Re: Chromium Portable (split from Pale Moon thread)

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:06 am
by SYSTEM
Thank you, kAlug.

I made the License field more exact and changed the download link.

Re: Chromium Portable

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:20 pm
by kAlug
The new release 16.0.912.15 includes support for the Do Not Track HTTP header, based on code available in Chromium's issue 81844.
In order to enable it, edit the Preferences file inside your profile folder (look at chrome://version, field "Profile path") with a decent editor and add "do_not_track": true, to the first line (after the {).

Re: Chromium Portable

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:08 pm
by lautrepay
kAlug wrote:The new release 16.0.912.15 includes support for the Do Not Track HTTP header, based on code available in Chromium's issue 81844.
In order to enable it, edit the Preferences file inside your profile folder (look at chrome://version, field "Profile path") with a decent editor and add "do_not_track": true, to the first line (after the {).
Atualizado. Obrigado!

Re: Chromium Portable

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:39 pm
by webfork
kAlug wrote:The new release 16.0.912.15 includes support for the Do Not Track HTTP header
Edited entry to reflect this addition.

Re: Chromium Portable

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:12 pm
by kAlug
webfork wrote:
kAlug wrote:The new release 16.0.912.15 includes support for the Do Not Track HTTP header
Edited entry to reflect this addition.
The only problem is that, the way you have written it, it seems that it is a Chromium feature, when in fact it is an addition to Chromium Portable. I suggest reverting the first paragraph and changing the second one to:
Chromium Portable is a custom-built version of the dev channel of the Chromium web browser, packaged in the PortableApps.com Format. It is optimized for portable use, supports jPortable and includes some modifications from the vanilla Chromium, like support for the Do Not Track opt-out specification.