It's not on TPFC. It's a simple checklist I doEmka wrote:I couldn't find such a statistic anywhere. Or, do you create it yourself?
It's hisguinness wrote:Checker tracks his/hers own updates!
It's not on TPFC. It's a simple checklist I doEmka wrote:I couldn't find such a statistic anywhere. Or, do you create it yourself?
It's hisguinness wrote:Checker tracks his/hers own updates!
The period is exactly seven days.Checker wrote:I don't know the exact time period, but I think it's surely less than a month
It's about 10 days or so.
The time between the latest two updates of the VideoCacheView entry is six days, 21 hours and 55 minutes.Andrew Lee wrote: This change restricts the rise of any database entry bubble to the top of the main page (and RSS feed) to once every seven days.
I do admit that updates of private entries are low priority for me.guinness wrote:I said this before ... that limiting how often an application is shown in the DB can deter people from updating the DB, because most people like to show in some way or another that they are contributing to TPFC.Nice question
That's not true. For example, in this poll 15 people wanted Andrew to do something to tackle the update frequency issue.guinness wrote: I also think it was a handful (only 1) which sparked the question of limiting the amount of updates per application.
Sorry, I don't count my updates. I think that I alone have done few dozen updates this year.Checker wrote: Another "nice" question: "How many updates did this "only 1" person for TPFC this year"
guinness wrote:I also think it was a handful (only 1) which sparked the question of limiting the amount of updates per application.
Checker wrote:Another "nice" question: "How many updates did this "only 1" person for TPFC this year"
Checker and SYSTEM, I'm pretty sure guinness meant that it was one frequently updating app (PEStudio) that prompted the limitation, not that it was a single user.SYSTEM wrote:That's not true. For example, in this poll 15 people wanted Andrew to do something to tackle the update frequency issue.
OK.guinness wrote:Yeh, I meant PE Studio but had completely forgotten the name since I hadn't seen many updates lately!
I never thought so, either. I suppose it's a transient problem - a developer has time to spare for a few days or weeks, and therefore churns update after update. At the time of those discussions, a few programs were coinciding with such a spurt of development. Maybe now that a couple of the biggest offenders have taken a breather (PEStudio was last updated over 3 months ago, and KidSafe hasn't been updated since October), the restriction could be lifted. On the other hand, as someone pointed out earlier, too frequent updates might be a sign of hurried releases, sloppy coding, or undeclared beta-testing.guinness wrote:OK. I still would like to know has it made much difference having the filter in place?
I never believed that NirSoft or computerfreaker were updating their applications to grab the limelight. Like I would do if I add an update I want to get it into the public domain as soon as possible.
That's for sure ... you are a busy bee, tooSYSTEM wrote:...I think that I alone have done few dozen updates this year.
My avatar may be, but not meguinness wrote:...your avatar eye appears to be wearing makeup
There may have been more "big offenders" which we haven't noticed thanks to the filter.ashghost wrote: Maybe now that a couple of the biggest offenders have taken a breather (PEStudio was last updated over 3 months ago, and KidSafe hasn't been updated since October), the restriction could be lifted.
That's definitely something you should be proud of. A good chunk of what brings high search-engine rankings -- and to some extent the success of the site and portable freeware -- is frequent site updates.Checker wrote:I did 441 version updates so far this year (according to my counter)
Thanks Checker ,Checker wrote:- Watch a video with your browser.
- Close your browser.
- Launch VideoCacheView.exe
Now your browsers cache should be displayed