AntiDupl.NET

Submit portable freeware that you find here. It helps if you include information like description, extraction instruction, Unicode support, whether it writes to the registry, and so on.
Message
Author
User avatar
__philippe
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:09 am

Re: AntiDupl.NET v 1.6

#16 Post by __philippe » Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:01 am

AntiDupl.NET-2.3.8. released as of 18-SEP-2015
Changelog:
- Swap the neighboring images in a horizontal look.

AntiDupl.NET-2.3.7. released as of 09-SEP-2015
Changelog:
- Highlight of image difference is added.
- Added the option "Show neighbour images".
- Added the options: "Load profile on loading", "Save profile on closing".
- Fixed deleting both images.

Antidupl self-extracting binaries + sources archives: http://antidupl.sourceforge.net/english ... nload.html

FWIW, both AntiDupl 2.3.7 and 2.3.8 most recent versions are flagged by VirusTotal with a 3/55 score.
Previous versions (up to 2.3.6) all scored "clean" on VT 0/55 score

JohnW
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:18 am
Location: London, UK

Re: AntiDupl.NET v 1.6

#17 Post by JohnW » Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:15 am

This was my duplicate image finder of choice.
It still is a program I use but I think Awesome duplicate photo finder is a little better.
Has anyone come across any others (eg Panaustik)

bitcoin
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 6:32 pm

Re: AntiDupl.NET

#18 Post by bitcoin » Wed Oct 14, 2020 3:59 pm

latest version returns 8 of 68 on Virus Total

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 9424
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: AntiDupl.NET

#19 Post by webfork » Thu Oct 15, 2020 8:23 pm

bitcoin wrote:
Wed Oct 14, 2020 3:59 pm
latest version returns 8 of 68 on Virus Total
I'm getting a slightly different result with 7/70: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/c30 ... /detection ... but that is a little higher than I'd prefer. Hopefully additional analysis in the coming weeks will bring that down.

Details:
AntiDupl.NET-2.3.10.exe
C30774A4F22A0C5B21CF916F0D963AA2930605D4BD1CA27A2CDEAC2665432623
Downloaded from: https://ermig1979.github.io/AntiDupl/en ... nload.html

bitcoin
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 6:32 pm

Re: AntiDupl.NET

#20 Post by bitcoin » Fri Oct 16, 2020 7:12 am

webfork wrote:
Thu Oct 15, 2020 8:23 pm
bitcoin wrote:
Wed Oct 14, 2020 3:59 pm
latest version returns 8 of 68 on Virus Total
I'm getting a slightly different result with 7/70: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/c30 ... /detection ... but that is a little higher than I'd prefer. Hopefully additional analysis in the coming weeks will bring that down.

Details:
AntiDupl.NET-2.3.10.exe
C30774A4F22A0C5B21CF916F0D963AA2930605D4BD1CA27A2CDEAC2665432623
Downloaded from: https://ermig1979.github.io/AntiDupl/en ... nload.html
yeah looks like somebody re-upped it

for some reason VT lately rejects my rescan requests from the excellent VT Hash Check program

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 9424
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: AntiDupl.NET

#21 Post by webfork » Fri Oct 16, 2020 11:39 am

bitcoin wrote:
Fri Oct 16, 2020 7:12 am
for some reason VT lately rejects my rescan requests from the excellent VT Hash Check program
Yeah VT has been very jealous about how it handles requests and contributions -- they seem to be pointing everything to their web interface so they can get some amount of user data from posters. I wouldn't be surprised if they turned off all other options besides the website interface at some point.

User avatar
Midas
Posts: 5467
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:09 am
Location: Sol3

Re: AntiDupl.NET

#22 Post by Midas » Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:54 pm

webfork wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if they turned off all other options besides the website interface at some point.

/OT

Data is the new oil -- and the big G is the old Standard... :nerd_face:

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 9424
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: AntiDupl.NET

#23 Post by webfork » Fri Oct 16, 2020 3:21 pm

Midas wrote:
Fri Oct 16, 2020 2:54 pm
Data is the new oil -- and the big G is the old Standard... :nerd_face:
I actually think the VirusTotal effort is one function provided by Google that is indeed a positive effect, even with frustrations like this one. But on the issue of monopolies, I read a great article recently on the topic:
Google is indeed a pretty nifty search tool. But it is not that much better than Yahoo or Bing — indeed, its algorithm is so present-biased that I find DuckDuckGo a superior tool when looking for less immediate material. What gives it roughly 80 percent of the online search traffic is first mover advantage.

...

The upshot here is that both Google's overwhelming search dominance and their profitable exploitation thereof are almost wholly unmerited in terms of their actual product. Google is a fine tool, but what defines the company is luck. Its profits come from a largely unearned strategic position within a socially-created communication medium.
https://theweek.com/articles/693488/goo ... g-internet

User avatar
Midas
Posts: 5467
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:09 am
Location: Sol3

Re: AntiDupl.NET

#24 Post by Midas » Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:21 am

webfork wrote:I actually think the VirusTotal effort is one function provided by Google that is indeed a positive effect...

And I wholeheartedly agree... there are a lot of other pluses they can claim, too. :ok:

It's just that at the unique scale they operate, their tiny failures become earth wrenching juggernauts.

Thanks for the pointer, added it to my reading queue.

Post Reply