Submit updates of portable freeware that are already listed in the database.
-
juzam
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 2:08 am
#1
Post
by juzam » Tue Jun 06, 2006 2:18 am
this is my first post, hope to do everything fine
http://cdexos.sourceforge.net/download.html
Code: Select all
Fixed Vorbis comment field problem and track number field problem
Updated to GNU based winamp plugins
Support conversion of WAV files > 2 GB
Updated Lame encoder
Updated Ogg encoder libraries
Add patches CDex 1.60++ (cue sheet generation)
Updated several language files
UTF-8 support for CDDB
Flac Support
at the moment you can download just the plain .exe installer
-
guinness
- Posts: 4118
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:00 am
-
Contact:
#3
Post
by guinness » Sun Nov 15, 2009 8:06 am
V1.70 Beta 3 is available
his version features a new hybrid installation approach. The installer includes the new 1.70 Beta 3 version
with many updates, but also the old Beta 2 Unicode and Non Unicode releases.
*Reverted database back to V1.70 Beta 2 seems to be a problem with the installer!
-
freakazoid
- Posts: 1129
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:45 pm
#4
Post
by freakazoid » Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:08 pm
Definitely not a fan of the new installer method!
They should bring back the .ZIP package.
is it stealth?
-
guinness
- Posts: 4118
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:00 am
-
Contact:
#5
Post
by guinness » Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:04 pm
The database has been changed? I had a look at CDEx's forum and found this
http://sourceforge.net/projects/cdexos/ ... ic/3459680, seems people are having problems with the new update! Hence why I reverted the entry back to beta 2 after testing. I agree the .ZIP format is much easier than have to Universal Extract.
-
webfork
- Posts: 10470
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
- Location: US, Texas
-
Contact:
#7
Post
by webfork » Thu May 21, 2015 2:13 pm
Adding a note about the
adware in the install version.
giulia wrote:AppData\Local\CDex\
Sigh.
I've been trying a bunch of different tricks to get around this but:
- Various command line tricks aren't working, help file is useless
- Dev's discussion forums up on the website and under sourceforge aren't working
This is why devs gotta just post a damn email address.
Anyway, my guess is I've gotta switch this over to the PortableApps version (WinPenPack is a little old). Suggestions?
-
webfork
- Posts: 10470
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
- Location: US, Texas
-
Contact:
#8
Post
by webfork » Sat May 30, 2015 9:28 am
[Moderator note: discussion surrounding the sourceforge hijack of the dormant CDex project has been moved to it's own thread.]
-
webfork
- Posts: 10470
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
- Location: US, Texas
-
Contact:
#9
Post
by webfork » Sat May 30, 2015 9:29 am
webfork wrote:Anyway, my guess is I've gotta switch this over to the PortableApps version (WinPenPack is a little old). Suggestions?
Any issues with this path?
-
webfork
- Posts: 10470
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
- Location: US, Texas
-
Contact:
#10
Post
by webfork » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:57 am
webfork wrote:webfork wrote:I've gotta switch this over to the PortableApps version (WinPenPack is a little old). Suggestions?
Any issues with this path?
Well, I think that was plenty of time for public comment so ... done.
-
giulia
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:09 am
#11
Post
by giulia » Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:38 am
hi
just download the last portable version
in the history there is
-Updated drive offsets
-Several bug fixes
but cdex does't use offsets like eac ,or foobar or freak
do i miss something?
thanks
-
webfork
- Posts: 10470
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
- Location: US, Texas
-
Contact:
#12
Post
by webfork » Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:57 pm
giulia wrote:but cdex does't use offsets like eac ,or foobar or freak
Offsets?
-
giulia
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:09 am
#13
Post
by giulia » Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:32 pm
webfork wrote:giulia wrote:but cdex does't use offsets like eac ,or foobar or freak
Offsets?
hi
in the changelog there is
-Updated drive offsets
-Several bug fixes
i can't find in the last version drive offsets
thanks
-
webfork
- Posts: 10470
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
- Location: US, Texas
-
Contact:
#15
Post
by webfork » Sat Dec 28, 2019 7:45 am
According to my research it's an adware bundler, which is not the same as malware but might as well be. Anyway, that's really unfortunate. Another major project in the past few weeks with a terrible VT rating is bad for everyone. Anyway, I ran a check on the various different files that are put out by this project (below).
File Data
- - Filename: CDex-2.23.exe
- MD5: DA7EE6D4EF56621DD1823B48691894C0
- SHA1: 9721865182D8F80B69203C7D3173A5721ACC5D35
id 3BEC6630A3D429061B8FE59156334BBAFCF30D2619D793EA2AD286792A84F91A
- VirusTotal Rating: 27/69
- VirusTotal URL: https://www.virustotal.com/file/3bec663 ... /analysis/
File Data
-
Filename: CDexPortable_2.23_online.paf.exe
MD5: A507153C8B3D421D1F8A3C3530484283
SHA1: 523F0E80B6582ECACE207464B2E5D16BA16C0DEA
SHA256: A8F859F980575AF83CA806032BB005B4D06F19ACA62F1711C05BB99E9032DD21
VirusTotal Rating: 1/70
VirusTotal URL: https://www.virustotal.com/file/a8f859f ... /analysis/
File Data
-
Filename: CDex-1.77-portable-unicode.zip
MD5: 6D58C6999126D331A3E826B2EC2A87AC
SHA1: 041C7739105A18CAC5ADAB2E2EC0D48A6899B19E
SHA256: 5906A9883E7691D028D4A5DC23633B7884CD27277E39D3FDFADC35028FEB40F0
VirusTotal Rating: 1/61
VirusTotal URL: https://www.virustotal.com/file/5906a98 ... /analysis/
The second one is the download we're pointing to. The one with a high VT rating is the newest installer in bold and in red. I'll add a note to the entry so no one gets confused. Thanks for catching that.
