Caesium

Submit portable freeware that you find here. It helps if you include information like description, extraction instruction, Unicode support, whether it writes to the registry, and so on.
Post Reply
Message
Author
SlowLearner
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:58 pm

Caesium - image compressor

#1 Post by SlowLearner » Sun Jul 24, 2011 1:12 am

Desciption:
Caesium reduces the size of your picture up to 90%, preserving the original quality. Caesium allows you to save a lot of space and quickly upload your pictures on the web (on sites like Facebook, MySpace etc) saving a lot of time. Also Webmasters for instance need to make sure the images they post on their websites are optimized, to avoid prolonged loading times for their visitors. The software allows you to view instantly the compression results, helping you to decide how much optimization you need. Caesium can set different compression levels to each image, saving a lot of time, ensuring great results!
Web-site:
http://caesium.sourceforge.net/index.html

Download page:
http://caesium.sourceforge.net/download.html

Portable version - direct download:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/caesiu ... p/download

User avatar
m^(2)
Posts: 890
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:38 am
Location: Kce,PL
Contact:

Re: Caesium - image compressor

#2 Post by m^(2) » Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:56 am

Great, is reduced my test set from 3.7 to 5.3 MB!
Err...maybe not so great.

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 9250
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Caesium - image compressor

#3 Post by webfork » Sun Jul 24, 2011 11:12 am

m^(2) wrote:Great, is reduced my test set from 3.7 to 5.3 MB!
Err...maybe not so great.
Thanks for testing. Its GPL and Addictive tips seemed to like it:

http://www.addictivetips.com/windows-ti ... d-convert/

Would be tough to get me to use something other than RIOT but I certainly prefer open source.

User avatar
m^(2)
Posts: 890
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:38 am
Location: Kce,PL
Contact:

Re: Caesium - image compressor

#4 Post by m^(2) » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:04 pm

I would have nothing against it if they labelled it just as a converter and not a strong lossless compressor. By default is lossy, so I wouldn't recommend it to newbies. And it's pathetically weak, so I wouldn't recommend it to advanced users either.

ADDED:
BTW even the example on their main site is lossy, if you look close the images are different.

freakazoid
Posts: 1000
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:45 pm

Re: Caesium - image compressor

#5 Post by freakazoid » Sun Jul 24, 2011 5:30 pm

Thanks for posting about RIOT; didn't know about that program before!
is it stealth? ;)

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 9250
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Caesium

#6 Post by webfork » Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:46 pm

http://www.softpedia.com/get/PORTABLE-S ... sium.shtml
http://caesium.sourceforge.net

It doesn't compare to some of the other tools on the site, but happy to have an OSS batch image processor. Developer was very responsive with a minor bug.

Wishlist

* Quality settings for PNG (cut down on colors, similar to RIOT)
* Click and drag to see different parts of the preview windows when viewed at normal size
* Some kind of separate preview that lets you compare both images in as large as possible views (ideally full screen, split horizontally or vertically)
* Other transform options (rotate, crop, watermarking, and other operations available in so many non-open and non-free graphics programs.)
* When you select "open folder" a checkbox should be available to open folders recursively.

Odd behavior:

* For some reason when you click on an item in the table, the resize goes down a percentage point or two and and gradually gets smaller and smaller. I'm not sure what that's supposed to do or how it works.

User avatar
I am Baas
Posts: 4146
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:51 am

Re: Caesium

#7 Post by I am Baas » Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:37 pm

Bəəs 2.0

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 9250
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Caesium

#8 Post by webfork » Fri Aug 30, 2013 4:09 pm

I am Baas wrote:Please merge.
Obligatory "I thought I searched for it" note goes here. Add extra embarrassment due to having commented on the old post and not remembering it.

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 9250
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Caesium - image compressor

#9 Post by webfork » Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:15 am

Caesium is up to 1.7.0 but can't find a changelog.

User avatar
giulia
Posts: 389
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:09 am

Re: Caesium

#10 Post by giulia » Tue Jan 14, 2020 10:13 am

hi
is the webpage https://saerasoft.com/caesium/ ?

why don't add to the database?
even it's no stealth ,but it could be enough yap

thanks

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 9250
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Caesium

#11 Post by webfork » Fri Jan 17, 2020 6:59 pm

giulia wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 10:13 am
is the webpage https://saerasoft.com/caesium/ ?
why don't add to the database?
No, that's a different program with the same name. I think the homepage for the program in this thread is http://caesium.sourceforge.net/ but sourceforge is having some kind of issue at the moment so I can't say for sure.

I've considered adding the sourceforge version, but the program hasn't been in development for years and doesn't have dramatically better features than similar tools already in the database. About the only reason to add it is because it's open source, but that wasn't a strong pull the last time I tested it.

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 9250
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Caesium

#12 Post by webfork » Sun Jan 19, 2020 8:11 am

I neglected to address the Saerasoft Caesium version ... it looks a bit like FileOptimizer (https://www.portablefreeware.com/index.php?id=2377), but cross-platform and solely for JPEGs. As I use FO for JPEGs probably more than anything else, I'm interested in tools like it, but cutting 10% off of a given file is pretty standard for FO as well.

There is a portable version listed on the downloads page. Untested.

User avatar
giulia
Posts: 389
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:09 am

Re: Caesium

#13 Post by giulia » Sun Jan 19, 2020 8:39 am

webfork wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2020 6:59 pm
giulia wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 10:13 am
is the webpage https://saerasoft.com/caesium/ ?
why don't add to the database?
No, that's a different program with the same name. I think the homepage for the program in this thread is http://caesium.sourceforge.net/ but sourceforge is having some kind of issue at the moment so I can't say for sure.

I've considered adding the sourceforge version, but the program hasn't been in development for years and doesn't have dramatically better features than similar tools already in the database. About the only reason to add it is because it's open source, but that wasn't a strong pull the last time I tested it.
hi
but i have downloaded from the 2 sites , and the hash is the same
i guess they are the same serasoft and caesium at soundforge
thanks

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 9250
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Caesium

#14 Post by webfork » Mon Jan 20, 2020 7:25 am

giulia wrote:
Sun Jan 19, 2020 8:39 am
\
but i have downloaded from the 2 sites , and the hash is the same
i guess they are the same serasoft and caesium at soundforge
Ah -- I see what happened: The converter program I was talking about did more than JPEG compression. It was converted or taken over by someone who cut out all the conversion functions. You can see the program I was talking about over at PA: https://portableapps.com/apps/graphics_ ... m-portable ... they also point to the SourceForge site, which is not the same program.

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 9250
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Caesium

#15 Post by webfork » Sat Feb 22, 2020 9:53 pm

Rudy5 wrote:
Sat Feb 22, 2020 1:31 pm
Download: https://www.fosshub.com/Caesium-Image-C ... 0-port.zip
Status: Portable - writes to settings.ini. Not stealth (Qtproject)
Have you compared it with FileOptmizer? Is it giving better results on JPEG files?

Post Reply