JaunePE 0.1.4 Bugs
- Zach Thibeau
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:26 pm
- Contact:
JaunePE 0.1.4 Bugs
Ok I found a bug in JauntePE I believe. I made an app portable then all of a sudden when making other apps portable with it nothing gets redirected at all. I think it's a JauntePE dll problem
I'm not sure whether this is the right place to post this but I assume REddlar will check this thread out so ...
I'm using V 0.1.3 but when I use the "test registry usage" Nothing at all is being picked up from any app.
I restored the version 0.1.0 JauntePe.dll and they're being picked up fine.
There is now a .reg file still being created but it also seems to be empty.
I dunno if this has already been mentioned or fixed or even if I'm messing this up somehow.
But "Every little helps?"
I'm using V 0.1.3 but when I use the "test registry usage" Nothing at all is being picked up from any app.
I restored the version 0.1.0 JauntePe.dll and they're being picked up fine.
There is now a .reg file still being created but it also seems to be empty.
I dunno if this has already been mentioned or fixed or even if I'm messing this up somehow.
But "Every little helps?"
- Zach Thibeau
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:26 pm
- Contact:
Well it's just when I make the app (and after I place all the dlls in the correct position) it stops redirecting my registry and app data. It did it the first time but the second time making an app portable it doesn't do it anymore. not even after I set what modules/Registry keys to includeChris wrote:Hi thibeaz,
Could you specify the problem you are having, you are using the launcher or you are making JPE-exe?
thibeaz, I don't really understand what you're getting at. Are you saying that simply creating a portable app is causing all apps run via JPE to stop working?
And please get specific with your descriptions. Your posts aren't helping us help you so I'm at a loss as what to suggest. I don't even understand what's going on on your end.
Just in case I missed something, I re-ran all of my test apps here, which do all sorts of mucking about with the registry and the file system, and use all sorts of combinations of app-specific JPE runtime ini options, etc. And everything's working as expected.
It could be that I've missed something, but until I know exactly what you're doing, what else can I say?
And please get specific with your descriptions. Your posts aren't helping us help you so I'm at a loss as what to suggest. I don't even understand what's going on on your end.
Just in case I missed something, I re-ran all of my test apps here, which do all sorts of mucking about with the registry and the file system, and use all sorts of combinations of app-specific JPE runtime ini options, etc. And everything's working as expected.
It could be that I've missed something, but until I know exactly what you're doing, what else can I say?
- Zach Thibeau
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:26 pm
- Contact:
Ok what I have been doing is Just the basic stuff. Likeredllar wrote:thibeaz, I don't really understand what you're getting at. Are you saying that simply creating a portable app is causing all apps run via JPE to stop working?
And please get specific with your descriptions. Your posts aren't helping us help you so I'm at a loss as what to suggest. I don't even understand what's going on on your end.
Just in case I missed something, I re-ran all of my test apps here, which do all sorts of mucking about with the registry and the file system, and use all sorts of combinations of app-specific JPE runtime ini options, etc. And everything's working as expected.
It could be that I've missed something, but until I know exactly what you're doing, what else can I say?
Registry Redirect
File System redirect and the rest is just about icon choosing.
How ever the exewcutable is made but when I click on it it laucnhes the app but no registry key/File system is redirected.
I hope that is a little more clear
Sorry, I was half asleep, I meant discover reg usage.I don't even know what "test registry usage" is. Could you please enlighten me?
I even spelled your name wrong too
Would it make any difference if I use the older JauntePE Dll when making my executable
and a newer version in the folder with that .exe btw?
@thibeaz:
Maybe:
1. You are forgetting Use=1.
Example:
2. You add registry folder and you haven't created the folder.
Example:
If not because of those, it's better if you explain in detail what you did in steps.
@Local:
Regarding your problem with Discovery, I would suggest to JPEized the installer and see what registry or file system the installer creates. If it won't work, it could be that the installer is not 32-bit application.
Or, better if you give us the link to the application-installer, then it can be checked if it a bug or not.
You mean on first time you create the exe, the redirections worked. And after you did some changes in the.ini, it wouldn't work anymore?How ever the exewcutable is made but when I click on it it laucnhes the app but no registry key/File system is redirected.
Maybe:
1. You are forgetting Use=1.
Example:
Code: Select all
[Registry]
Use=1
[Filesystem]
Use=1
Example:
You need to create the folder "JPE-Registry".[Registry]
Use=1
Data=.\JPE-Registry\%appname%_registry.reg
If not because of those, it's better if you explain in detail what you did in steps.
@Local:
I believe the process of creating .exe is not involving the JauntePE.dll. As you can create the exe even without the dll.Would it make any difference if I use the older JauntePE Dll when making my executable
and a newer version in the folder with that .exe btw?
Regarding your problem with Discovery, I would suggest to JPEized the installer and see what registry or file system the installer creates. If it won't work, it could be that the installer is not 32-bit application.
Or, better if you give us the link to the application-installer, then it can be checked if it a bug or not.
Discovery mode! I plum forgot all about the bugs for that mode.I meant discover reg usage
I think you've run into the same problem that grannyGeek did. If you have created an app-specific JPE ini for it, temporarily rename it to something else and then re-run discovery mode against the app. If that still doesn't work I think grannyGeek was able to get it to work by temporarily dropping back to the 011 JPE dll. Meanwhile I'll make sure to note myself about fixing those bugs for good. Thanks for reminding me.
Chris is right about the JPE dll not impacting portable launcher exe creation. That's all done via one of the JPE exes. And the JPE exes haven't changed any since 011.Would it make any difference if I use the older JauntePE Dll when making my executable and a newer version in the folder with that .exe btw?
Thanks for that guys
I'm already using the 011 dll so I'm happy with that.
I keep messing up my ini's for al the exe's I create so I won't mess around with one for discovery.
@Chris
When I try to use a non 32 bit app it woks fine and tells me straight out that it isn't supported
If I haven't said it yet , Thanks Redllar for a great piece of software.
If you wanted to make a difference for people with it you definitely did it right.
I'm already using the 011 dll so I'm happy with that.
I keep messing up my ini's for al the exe's I create so I won't mess around with one for discovery.
@Chris
When I try to use a non 32 bit app it woks fine and tells me straight out that it isn't supported
If I haven't said it yet , Thanks Redllar for a great piece of software.
If you wanted to make a difference for people with it you definitely did it right.
- Zach Thibeau
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:26 pm
- Contact:
Never mind Redllar I found the problem. The problem was the fact JauntePE is not working on amd based processors (I know as I tested it on my amd athlon xp mobile laptop and my amd duron desktop computer)redllar wrote:Uhmm, no, not for me. I'm giving up now. Sorry. Hopefully someone else can help.I hope that is a little more clear
I hope that answers my confusion. (It works fine on my parents intel computer)
- Zach Thibeau
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:26 pm
- Contact: