Textosaurus (Textilosaurus) - simple text editor
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
If I ever made a public program, I'd name it PKD. BTW, nice list there, skunkos.
The devil is in details... otherwise fine by me.
The devil is in details... otherwise fine by me.
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
Before the rest of my reply, I don't think I've seen a thorough conversation on the site about a program name, so this is a first. Naming issues are usually something I get no response on.
It's kinda nice.
A quick followup on this point:
8-zip - http://www.softpedia.com/get/Compressio ... Lite.shtml
Rufus (RSS reader, and there's already a great Linux distro tool with that name) - https://github.com/jtanza/rufus
It's kinda nice.
This is definitely new. I never thought to use this approach for a program / project name. I definitely like any reference to Kant, although I think I've seen a few programs try to use that in their name.skunkos wrote: ↑Wed Jan 10, 2018 10:04 pmLet me assemble some list maybe there will be some good word: Scrib (modification of latin translation for "text"), Kant (surname of Immanuel Kant, one of best writing philosophers of all time), Tekstpad, Liber (sheet of paper in latin), Skriptum (book in latin), Caput (paragraph in latin), Verbum (sentence in latin), Epistol (tweaked translation of "writing" in latin), Plumbum (pencil in latin).
A quick followup on this point:
Two recent super-not-unique names I came across:
8-zip - http://www.softpedia.com/get/Compressio ... Lite.shtml
Rufus (RSS reader, and there's already a great Linux distro tool with that name) - https://github.com/jtanza/rufus
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
We have to admit that there is so many entities (sw applications, companies, movies, people names, teams etc) with unique names that it is in fact very hard to pick good, soundy and nice-to-remember title.
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
Testing latest release...
Suggestions (mostly UI releated):
Suggestions (mostly UI releated):
- "View | Sidebars | Markdown preview" works as a toggle, doesn't display a check mark when activated like sibling options -- which BTW don't stay in synch with current options;
- make "Filesystem" favorites pane resizable/hideable;
- simplify the menu system -- as they are presently very scantily populated, "Edit" and "Search" could possibly be merged; at the other end in terms of population, but likewise, mostly because they won't see heavy use, same for the "Encoding" and "Language" entries, moving them to the end before "Help";
- make the line number columnar margin a little wider, maybe three digits wide from the start -- it helps with line selection, too, so maybe flip mouse pointer while hovering.
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
Still about the naming debate...
author of https://www.theatlantic.com/article/374912/ wrote:Companies with names that are simple and easy to pronounce see significantly higher investments than more complexly named stocks, especially just after their initial public offerings when information on the stock’s fundamentals are most scarce. People with easier to pronounce names are also judged more positively and tend to be hired and promoted more often than their more obscurely named peers.
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
COuld you eventually turn your suggestions into bug reports? Thank you so much.Midas wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2018 4:47 am Testing latest release...
Suggestions (mostly UI releated):More possibly coming up, as the testing progresses... great job.
- "View | Sidebars | Markdown preview" works as a toggle, doesn't display a check mark when activated like sibling options -- which BTW don't stay in synch with current options;
- make "Filesystem" favorites pane resizable/hideable;
- simplify the menu system -- as they are presently very scantily populated, "Edit" and "Search" could possibly be merged; at the other end in terms of population, but likewise, mostly because they won't see heavy use, same for the "Encoding" and "Language" entries, moving them to the end before "Help";
- make the line number columnar margin a little wider, maybe three digits wide from the start -- it helps with line selection, too, so maybe flip mouse pointer while hovering.
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
I created TODO myself, thanks, will integrate some changes.
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
Some updates: Textilosausur Windows binaries will be from now on compiled with MinGW-w64 toolchain instead of MSVC compiler, which will allow us to get rid of MSVC runtime dependency. Moreover, I am working on fully static build, which will allow to get rid of all DLL files and only single .exe binary will be distributed, thus Textilosaurus will be: single fully portable x64 binary.
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
Nice. But won't that increase file size dramatically?
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
That is the question. In theory, no. Static library files could be even a bit smaller than DLL counterparts. So the overall sum of sizes of all used libraries could be about the same.
Please test, this is first experimental static build: https://transfer.sh/3nIUq/textilosaurus ... 0-win64.7z
EDIT: Proof: https://imgur.com/a/CpOQS
Please test, this is first experimental static build: https://transfer.sh/3nIUq/textilosaurus ... 0-win64.7z
EDIT: Proof: https://imgur.com/a/CpOQS
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
In fact:
Textilosaurus portable folder disk cost | |
Static build | 30.8 MB (32 378 880 bytes) |
Dinamic build | 31.5 MB (33 072 580 bytes) |
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
So you tested static build? Do you feel its okay as for speed/size?
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
100% on my part. Although my testing isn't as methodical, comprehensive or accurate as TP109's...
Re: Textilosaurus - simple text editor
https://github.com/martinrotter/textilo ... 2018.01.31
I came back to MSVC toolchain, but I compiled Qt myself in minimalistic configuration and with some extra optimizations enabled - https://github.com/martinrotter/qt5-minimalistic-builds
Thus, Textilosaurus binary is now smaller than it was before. Moreover it should start faster. There are NO direct dependencies, everything is compiled directly into the exe (tested on multiplet Windows versions). In same cases there may be external transitive dependencies cause by differences in system libraries, particularly Windows CRT runtime may be needed on some setups.
Plus, some new features and fixes are added.
I came back to MSVC toolchain, but I compiled Qt myself in minimalistic configuration and with some extra optimizations enabled - https://github.com/martinrotter/qt5-minimalistic-builds
Thus, Textilosaurus binary is now smaller than it was before. Moreover it should start faster. There are NO direct dependencies, everything is compiled directly into the exe (tested on multiplet Windows versions). In same cases there may be external transitive dependencies cause by differences in system libraries, particularly Windows CRT runtime may be needed on some setups.
Plus, some new features and fixes are added.