Photodemon

Submit portable freeware that you find here. It helps if you include information like description, extraction instruction, Unicode support, whether it writes to the registry, and so on.
Message
Author
User avatar
webfork
Posts: 7924
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Photodemon

#16 Post by webfork » Sun May 24, 2015 12:33 pm

Supporting Net Neutrality - BattleForTheNet | Why this matters | More from EFF.org

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 7924
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Photodemon

#17 Post by webfork » Fri Nov 10, 2017 3:32 pm

I'd like to say it's my birthday today since I definitely got a present: one of my favorite programs just put out the latest beta with a lot of work behind it: http://photodemon.org/

Screenshot (linking as it's somewhat large): https://i.imgur.com/Pagy6RR.png
Supporting Net Neutrality - BattleForTheNet | Why this matters | More from EFF.org

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 7924
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Photodemon

#18 Post by webfork » Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 pm

This is rapidly becoming a compliment or accessory to other powerful, free tools like GIMP, Photivo and RawTherapee.
Supporting Net Neutrality - BattleForTheNet | Why this matters | More from EFF.org

User avatar
Dwel
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:07 pm

Re: Photodemon

#19 Post by Dwel » Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:24 pm

What should I think of this? on Firefox 57.0.2
2017-12-14 15_21_52-.jpg
2017-12-14 15_21_52-.jpg (13.63 KiB) Viewed 3091 times

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 7924
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Photodemon

#20 Post by webfork » Fri Dec 15, 2017 4:34 am

Dwel wrote:What should I think of this? on Firefox 57.0.2
2017-12-14 15_21_52-.jpg
I didn't see that when I downloaded it so I'm not sure what to say. I'd go ahead and download it and then check with VirusTotal to see if it's a false positive.

Hashes:
  • CRC32: daf51c6e
    MD5: c95b3cf2b078ed63fd875163193b768c
    SHA1: e2beec918312161f2af8412ddbb66ac4e08fdebf
    SHA256: deaacde658e5e6f6f4949ad6049a149c6785722981dea71868420ba1d378eb5c
VT is giving it a 14/61, which I'll admit is high:
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/deaac ... /detection

... but you can download it from Softpedia as well:
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Multimedia ... emon.shtml
Supporting Net Neutrality - BattleForTheNet | Why this matters | More from EFF.org

thepiney
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:57 am

Re: Photodemon

#21 Post by thepiney » Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:07 pm

webfork wrote:
Dwel wrote:What should I think of this? on Firefox 57.0.2

VT is giving it a 14/61, which I'll admit is high:
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/deaac ... /detection
It's only showing an 11/61 now so I'd guess false positives.

Post Reply