Shotcut - video editor

Submit portable freeware that you find here. It helps if you include information like description, extraction instruction, Unicode support, whether it writes to the registry, and so on.
Message
Author
User avatar
webfork
Posts: 10818
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#16 Post by webfork »

Midas wrote: Sun Feb 11, 2018 3:44 amnot to those same packages being run with the '--noupgrade --appdata [path]' detailed by gbrao two posts prior... :roll:
No worries. OpenShot is one of the few programs where I've actually talked to the dev in real life about portability so I'm glad to hear it's working ok.

gbrao
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 11:24 pm

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#17 Post by gbrao »

Version 18.03 released.

https://shotcut.org/blog/new-release-1803/
Added a Sketch filter.
Added numeric fields to the Color Grading filter.
Added All option to Properties > Audio > Track.
Added Estonian translation.
Improved image loading speed on Windows.
Improved mouse-wheel & trackpad scrolling in Timeline.
Improved support for JACK Audio (Linux and macOS only).
Upgraded FFmpeg to version 3.4 and latest vpx for much faster VP9 encoding.
Upgrade MLT to v6.6.0.
Upgraded SDL to version 2.0.

gbrao
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 11:24 pm

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#18 Post by gbrao »

Version 18.05 is now available
https://shotcut.org/blog/new-release-1805/
Keyframes
...

5.1 Surround Sound
...

Other

Added Finnish translation.
Restored GIF Animation for Export.
Reduced memory footprint (especially for the Rotate and Size and Position filters).
Changed default Export settings to reduce output size by increasing GOP and number of B frames.


Specular
Posts: 443
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:54 pm

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#19 Post by Specular »

Looking solid 👍

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 10818
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#20 Post by webfork »

The program came up on Techradar's video editor best-of:
There's no getting away from the fact that Shotcut has a steep learning curve. It's possible to achieve some impressive results by simply applying one of its many filters to your video, but the real rewards will only be reaped by those willing to invest the time and energy in fully getting to grips with what's on offer.
https://www.techradar.com/news/software ... or-1330136

User avatar
Midas
Posts: 6710
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:09 am
Location: Sol3

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#21 Post by Midas »

Topic update: Shotcut v20.02.17 released 2020-02-17 (changelog at https://www.shotcut.org/download/releasenotes/).

User avatar
Midas
Posts: 6710
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:09 am
Location: Sol3

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#22 Post by Midas »

Shotcut v21.01.29 released (mentioned as v20.01.29 in release notes: https://www.shotcut.org/download/releasenotes/; correct in announcement at https://www.shotcut.org/blog/new-release-210129/)

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 10818
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#23 Post by webfork »

Shotcut has been added to the database. Please vote: https://www.portablefreeware.com/index.php?id=3049

El Facu
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2021 11:16 pm

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#24 Post by El Facu »

Shotcut is natively portable if you run shotcut.exe --appdata .\Profile
The profile folder will automatically get created
There are dozens of portable apps in submission forum and you add PortableCrapps sh!t. If you like them so much why don't you go and play mod in their forums? Sorry...

User avatar
Midas
Posts: 6710
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:09 am
Location: Sol3

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#25 Post by Midas »

@El Facu: for a first post, that wasn't really respectful of people who have devoted years to this site.

The only reason I approved your post is because you're proposing a portability solution.

To avoid future grief, I'd advise you to watch your words when posting in TPFC forums.

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 10818
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#26 Post by webfork »

El Facu wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 11:26 pm Shotcut is natively portable if you run shotcut.exe --appdata .\Profile
Didn't know that, thanks.
El Facu wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 11:26 pm If you like them so much why don't you go and play mod in their forums?
We're all volunteers here, just trying to do what we can to help out freeware devs.

User avatar
Andrew Lee
Posts: 3052
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Contact:

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#27 Post by Andrew Lee »

I have updated the entry with the new information, and also added a link in the description to the PA entry (as we normally do for such cases).

On a side note, I am appalled by such behaviour that normally wouldn't occur in the physical world. Let's face it, very few people would behave like total pricks and survive in meatspace (other than Steve Jobs :lol:). The only reason why people do it in abundance on the Internet is because of the anonymity and the lack of meaningful consequence. It speaks volumes about the dark side of human nature when freed of social constraints.

siegfried
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:05 am

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#28 Post by siegfried »

El Facu wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 11:26 pm Shotcut is natively portable if you run shotcut.exe --appdata .\Profile
I tested the latest portable version of Shotcut (v23.09.29) with "shotcut.exe --appdata .\Profile". It's not stealth:

c:\Documents and Settings\<useraccount>\AppData\Local\Meltytech\
c:\Documents and Settings\<useraccount>\AppData\Local\Meltytech\Shotcut\
c:\Documents and Settings\<useraccount>\AppData\Local\Meltytech\Shotcut\cache\
c:\Documents and Settings\<useraccount>\AppData\Local\Meltytech\Shotcut\cache\qmlcache\

User avatar
Andrew Lee
Posts: 3052
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Contact:

Re: Shotcut - video editor

#29 Post by Andrew Lee »

@siegfried: Thanks! I have updated the database entry to reflect this piece of info.

Post Reply