TP109 wrote:Tested MadEdit-mod v0.4.0 and CudaText v1.2.15.
Uploaded results to the link below. Good for 28 days:
http://www.fileconvoy.com/dfl.php?id=g9 ... d969a28f61
Search found 8 matches
- Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:46 am
- Forum: Portable Freeware Discussion
- Topic: Text Editor Performance Tests
- Replies: 153
- Views: 288306
Re: Text Editor Performance Tests
Still old one? I did not find the result for 0.4.0. Only 0.3.10&0.3.9
- Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:15 pm
- Forum: Portable Freeware Discussion
- Topic: Text Editor Performance Tests
- Replies: 153
- Views: 288306
Re: Text Editor Performance Tests
Hi, TP109,
MadEdit-Mod 0.4.0 has just been released. Would you please run your test again? I tried benchmark tests on some linux x86/x64. Almost doubled performance on opening big text file(68M).
MadEdit-Mod 0.4.0 has just been released. Would you please run your test again? I tried benchmark tests on some linux x86/x64. Almost doubled performance on opening big text file(68M).
- Thu Dec 31, 2015 11:45 pm
- Forum: Portable Freeware Discussion
- Topic: Text Editor Performance Tests
- Replies: 153
- Views: 288306
Re: Text Editor Performance Tests
minggang, The purpose of the test results posted to this forum is to provide TPFC members and visitors with independent information on the performance capabilities and limitations of portable and freeware text editors to help users make informed decisions for selecting suitable text editors accordi...
- Thu Dec 31, 2015 6:09 am
- Forum: Portable Freeware Discussion
- Topic: Text Editor Performance Tests
- Replies: 153
- Views: 288306
Re: Text Editor Performance Tests
It's not a big duel to choose OK or Cancel or add a new button for this. It was designed by the founder. So, I did not change it since then.I am Baas wrote: Yes, it does. I just did not notice it the first time (and did not expect it to be there).
- Wed Dec 30, 2015 1:54 am
- Forum: Portable Freeware Discussion
- Topic: Text Editor Performance Tests
- Replies: 153
- Views: 288306
Re: Text Editor Performance Tests
Tested MadEdit-mod v3.10. Results are nearly identical to v3.09, so no significant change observed as far as these tests go. Again, didn't test beyond 66.5MB because of the load time for the first test file. Corrected the spreadsheet to indicate a test file size of 66.5MB (68,000kB, a difference of...
- Wed Dec 30, 2015 1:20 am
- Forum: Portable Freeware Discussion
- Topic: Text Editor Performance Tests
- Replies: 153
- Views: 288306
Re: Text Editor Performance Tests
I just want to make it better. There is one annoyance that you should fix... I tested MadEdit-Mod 0.3.10 x64 and discovered that upon closing the "About MadEdit-Mod" window, it will attempt lo launch a Webpage. Hi, Baas, it said "Press OK to visit our HomePage.". You may click C...
- Sun Dec 27, 2015 11:10 pm
- Forum: Portable Freeware Discussion
- Topic: Text Editor Performance Tests
- Replies: 153
- Views: 288306
Re: Text Editor Performance Tests
Hi, TP109, thanks for the information. It's OK.
Anyway, MadEdit is not famous for the performance but the extraordinary encoding support, cross-platform and Hex edit. I just want to make it better.
Thanks for your information that can help me to do performance tune.
Anyway, MadEdit is not famous for the performance but the extraordinary encoding support, cross-platform and Hex edit. I just want to make it better.
Thanks for your information that can help me to do performance tune.
- Sun Dec 27, 2015 1:23 am
- Forum: Portable Freeware Discussion
- Topic: Text Editor Performance Tests
- Replies: 153
- Views: 288306
Re: Text Editor Performance Tests
Good to know the results. I did some optimization on MadEdit-Mod and I think it should be 20~30% or even more better than 0.3.9/10 now. Would you please share your text file to do the test and the steps so that I can verify it? I did not have a WinXP. However, the performance difference between MadE...