FileVerifier++

Submit portable freeware that you find here. It helps if you include information like description, extraction instruction, Unicode support, whether it writes to the registry, and so on.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
guinness
Posts: 4118
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:00 am
Contact:

FileVerifier++

#1 Post by guinness »

Tested: Portable

Should it be added since there are so many integrity checkers?

Download: http://www.programmingunlimited.net/sit ... gi?page=fv

User avatar
Wolfghost
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 6:14 am
Location: Norway

Re: FileVerifier++

#2 Post by Wolfghost »

guinness wrote:[Should it be added since there are so many integrity checkers?
Is it restriction time now or...................???? :?

User avatar
guinness
Posts: 4118
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:00 am
Contact:

Re: FileVerifier++

#3 Post by guinness »

No, not at all. :D I haven't added many applications to TPFC, so I wanted to know if users had any objections to this application being added to TPFC.

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 10818
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: FileVerifier++

#4 Post by webfork »

guinness wrote:No, not at all. :D I haven't added many applications to TPFC, so I wanted to know if users had any objections to this application being added to TPFC.
There are a LOT of file verification / hashing programs here on the site, so it would be nice to have something the others don't. This one appears to have a broad algorithm support and a verification system. So this one looks like its worth the time.

User avatar
guinness
Posts: 4118
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:00 am
Contact:

Re: FileVerifier++

#5 Post by guinness »

OK, thanks WebFork, this was the answer I was looking for :D I think its great to have a unique database, instead of having the same program replicated many times with a different name! (no examples spring to mind!)

User avatar
guinness
Posts: 4118
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:00 am
Contact:

Re: FileVerifier++

#6 Post by guinness »


User avatar
I am Baas
Posts: 4150
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:51 am

Re: FileVerifier++

#7 Post by I am Baas »

Sorry guinness but you will have to adjust your count... http://www.portablefreeware.com/forums/ ... 691#p24691 :(

User avatar
guinness
Posts: 4118
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:00 am
Contact:

Re: FileVerifier++

#8 Post by guinness »

OK, didn't see it the DB and it didn't have a separate forum topic, so I presumed it hadn't been added/suggested. Sorry.

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 10818
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: FileVerifier++

#9 Post by webfork »

guinness wrote:OK, didn't see it the DB and it didn't have a separate forum topic, so I presumed it hadn't been added/suggested. Sorry.
I am Baas wrote:Sorry guinness but you will have to adjust your count... http://www.portablefreeware.com/forums/ ... 691#p24691 :(
Suggestion count, not testing count.

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 10818
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: FileVerifier++

#10 Post by webfork »

I asked the author a question I thought I'd share here:
is there a way to tweak FileVerifier++ to save individual hash files rather than a hash index file? For example, hashing:

file1.txt
file2.txt

... would create ...

file1.sfv
file2.sfv

I'm trying to put together hashes for individual files.
His response:
This can't be done with the GUI, but can be accomplished with FVC called from a script. There's a somewhat similar example that creates a hash file for each directory (as opposed to a single file). The example is the file fvc-batch.js which is located in the same directory as fvc.exe and fv.exe.

Post Reply