Photodemon

Submit portable freeware that you find here. It helps if you include information like description, extraction instruction, Unicode support, whether it writes to the registry, and so on.

Moderators: usdcs, Andrew Lee, webfork

Message
Author
User avatar
webfork
Posts: 7515
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Photodemon

#16 Post by webfork » Sun May 24, 2015 12:33 pm

Supporting Net Neutrality - BattleForTheNet | Why this matters | More from EFF.org

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 7515
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Photodemon

#17 Post by webfork » Fri Nov 10, 2017 3:32 pm

I'd like to say it's my birthday today since I definitely got a present: one of my favorite programs just put out the latest beta with a lot of work behind it: http://photodemon.org/

Screenshot (linking as it's somewhat large): https://i.imgur.com/Pagy6RR.png
Supporting Net Neutrality - BattleForTheNet | Why this matters | More from EFF.org

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 7515
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Photodemon

#18 Post by webfork » Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:52 pm

This is rapidly becoming a compliment or accessory to other powerful, free tools like GIMP, Photivo and RawTherapee.
Supporting Net Neutrality - BattleForTheNet | Why this matters | More from EFF.org

User avatar
Dwel
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:07 pm

Re: Photodemon

#19 Post by Dwel » Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:24 pm

What should I think of this? on Firefox 57.0.2
2017-12-14 15_21_52-.jpg
2017-12-14 15_21_52-.jpg (13.63 KiB) Viewed 1360 times

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 7515
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Photodemon

#20 Post by webfork » Fri Dec 15, 2017 4:34 am

Dwel wrote:What should I think of this? on Firefox 57.0.2
2017-12-14 15_21_52-.jpg
I didn't see that when I downloaded it so I'm not sure what to say. I'd go ahead and download it and then check with VirusTotal to see if it's a false positive.

Hashes:
  • CRC32: daf51c6e
    MD5: c95b3cf2b078ed63fd875163193b768c
    SHA1: e2beec918312161f2af8412ddbb66ac4e08fdebf
    SHA256: deaacde658e5e6f6f4949ad6049a149c6785722981dea71868420ba1d378eb5c
VT is giving it a 14/61, which I'll admit is high:
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/deaac ... /detection

... but you can download it from Softpedia as well:
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Multimedia ... emon.shtml
Supporting Net Neutrality - BattleForTheNet | Why this matters | More from EFF.org

thepiney
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:57 am

Re: Photodemon

#21 Post by thepiney » Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:07 pm

webfork wrote:
Dwel wrote:What should I think of this? on Firefox 57.0.2

VT is giving it a 14/61, which I'll admit is high:
https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/deaac ... /detection
It's only showing an 11/61 now so I'd guess false positives.

Post Reply