It is currently Wed Oct 18, 2017 5:58 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: FileZillaSecure
PostPosted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 8:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2016 8:05 pm
Posts: 1
Hi, I'm one of the Filezilla Secure devs.

smaragdus wrote:
It seems that FileZillaSecure does not respect FileZilla portability settings- it always writes to AppData (C:\Users\UserName\AppData\Roaming\FileZillaSecure)- sloppy work, I will not test this program any more.

Can you tell me exactly what Filezilla Secure is doing that Filezilla doesn't?

smaragdus wrote:
Probably the developer intended to get some donations by cheating the users that the Windows XP version is still in development. I think that it is no coincidence that the latest FileZillaSecure version is the last FileZilla version which supports Windows XP- 3.18.0.0. This looks like a fraud. I am sorry I posted about FileZillaSecure.

FileZillaSecure 3.18.0.0 does not run in a XP vm for me. I don't know when Filezilla dropped XP support but according to a post above:

JohnTHaller wrote:
FileZilla 3.9.0.2 fully drops Windows XP support and won't run. I've updated the entry and added a link to the older and unsupported 3.9.0.1 build for Windows XP users.

We will release a Filezilla Secure version of 3.9.0.1 or whatever the newest version that works with XP is if there is enough demand for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FileZillaSecure
PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Posts: 7283
Location: US, Texas
fzss wrote:
Hi, I'm one of the Filezilla Secure devs.

Hi and welcome to the forum.

fzss wrote:
smaragdus wrote:
It seems that FileZillaSecure does not respect FileZilla portability settings

Can you tell me exactly what Filezilla Secure is doing that Filezilla doesn't?

FileZilla has a functionality available that lets you use an XML file to handle where settings are stored (described in the extract process here: https://www.portablefreeware.com/index.php?id=9) I have not tested this but I suspect what smaragdus is saying is that functionality isn't available in FileZillaSecure. As such it's settings don't travel with the program, which is our main objective on this site.

_________________
Supporting Net Neutrality - BattleForTheNet | Why this matters | More from EFF.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FileZilla - a bug
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:24 am
Posts: 1769
Location: Aeaea
I think that there must be a bug in FileZilla versions 3.23.0.0 and 3.23.0.1 which affects portability, these versions write to AppData (C:\Users\UserName\AppData\Local\FileZilla)- theme files (.PNG) are extracted there. I suppose that the bug has something to do with this change in version 3.23.0-rc1 (2016-11-28):
Quote:
New high-resolution icons
For me the last version of FileZilla that really works in portable mode is 3.22.2.2. I will appreciate a confirmation of this problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FileZilla entry
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 2901
Location: Romania
Tested FileZilla_3.23.0.1_win64.zip on win10x64.

-downloaded .zip file and extract
-created settings sub-folder
-renamed fzdefaults.xml.example file from docs sub-folder to fzdefaults.xml
-edit fzdefaults.xml so the string $SOMEDIR/filezilla/ from Config Location line now reads settings
-moved fzdefaults.xml from docs up one level (same as filezilla.exe)
-run filezilla.exe

Result: config files are saved in settings sub-folder, but the icons cache is still created in AppData.

Verdict: portable, not stealth (I'm sure it will be fixed in future versions).

Note: quote from the fzdefaults.xml file:
Quote:
Kiosk mode

If the "Kiosk mode" setting is set to 1, FileZilla will not write any
passwords to disk. If set to 2, FileZilla will not write to any
configuration file. The latter is useful if FileZilla gets executed from
read-only media.

Disable update check

If the "Disable update check" setting is set to 1, the capability to
check for new FileZilla versions will be completely disabled.

_________________
My Tox ID


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FileZilla
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:24 am
Posts: 1769
Location: Aeaea
@joby_toss
Thank you for the confirmation. This problem seems to happen for the first time (I use FileZilla since version 3.4.0.0 from 2011.05.09).
Quote:
Verdict: portable, not stealth (I'm sure it
will be fixed in future versions).
I hope so.

Edit
The developer (Tim Kosse) responded that:
Quote:
This is intentional and not a bug.

From the NEWS file:
Quote:
Speed up icon scaling and cache scaled icons for faster subsequent loading. The cache directory can be changed through fzdefaults.xml using the "Cache directory" setting
I failed to use "Cache directory" setting. Since this is not a bug I think that FileZilla database entry needs to be updated. I do not like this change at all.

Edit
My forum rank at FileZilla Forum - 500 Command not understood:
Image

seems right.

Edit
I forgot to mention that:
Quote:
Registration using a gmail.com address has been blocked due to massive amount of spambots registering through gmail. Please use an email address from a private or for-pay email hoster instead.
Image

Edit
I wasted more than an hour struggling with the latest versions of FileZilla, I think I will keep to version 3.22.2.2, at least for the time being.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FileZilla entry
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:28 pm
Posts: 438
Quote:
3.23.0.2 (2016-12-06)

Bugfixes and minor changes:

...
  • Allow relative paths and environment variables in the "Cache directory" setting.


Fixed?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FileZilla entry
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 2901
Location: Romania
Yes, it is! Thank you, Mr. Tim Kosse!

@smaragdus: Thank's for bringing this to developer's attention!

_________________
My Tox ID


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FileZilla entry
PostPosted: Sun May 14, 2017 11:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:09 am
Posts: 289
hi
it creates a folder with several png files in c:\Users\User\AppData\Local\FileZilla\
at least under w7

thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FileZilla cache directory
PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2017 10:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:24 am
Posts: 1769
Location: Aeaea
@giulia

giulia wrote:
hi
it creates a folder with several png files in c:\Users\User\AppData\Local\FileZilla\
at least under w7

thanks

For more information see the comments above and this forum thread.

For example if you would like to have the cache folder inside FileZilla folder open fzdefaults.xml and change this string:

Code:
<Setting name="Cache directory">$USERPROFILE/Documents</Setting>
to
Code:
<Setting name="Cache directory">cache</Setting>

Then the scaled icons would be stored in \FileZilla\cache.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FileZilla cache directory
PostPosted: Sat May 27, 2017 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:09 am
Posts: 289
smaragdus wrote:
@giulia

giulia wrote:
hi
it creates a folder with several png files in c:\Users\User\AppData\Local\FileZilla\
at least under w7

thanks

For more information see the comments above and this forum thread.

For example if you would like to have the cache folder inside FileZilla folder open fzdefaults.xml and change this string:

Code:
<Setting name="Cache directory">$USERPROFILE/Documents</Setting>
to
Code:
<Setting name="Cache directory">cache</Setting>

Then the scaled icons would be stored in \FileZilla\cache.

hi smaragdus
thank you !
i have to add the
Code:
<Setting name="Cache directory">cache</Setting>
because my preferences don't include
Code:
<Setting name="Cache directory">$USERPROFILE/Documents</Setting>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FileZilla Pro
PostPosted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:24 am
Posts: 1769
Location: Aeaea
There is a paid version of FileZilla - FileZilla Pro, which supports Amazon S3 and costs 8,88 €/9,95 $:

Image

The installers offered for download at FileZilla web-site (https://filezilla-project.org/) are bundled, better get it from SourceForge (https://sourceforge.net/projects/filezilla/files/).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FileZilla entry
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 25, 2017 8:41 pm
Posts: 4
That's a true problem. So for important accounts, just do not use use such software in case of malware. I use lastPass for simple password remembering.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FileZilla entry
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:44 pm
Posts: 572
Location: New York, NY
Also worth noting that the website switches the position of FileZilla and FileZilla Pro in the above image between downloads seemingly at random. So when you go to upgrade there's a good chance it's on the left rather than the right like it was the last time you downloaded or vice versa.

_________________
PortableApps.com - The open standard for portable software


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FileZilla Pro
PostPosted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Posts: 7283
Location: US, Texas
smaragdus wrote:
There is a paid version of FileZilla - FileZilla Pro, which supports Amazon S3 and costs 8,88 €/9,95 $:

As you noted with Snipaste developing a "pro" version, this is unfortunate but, given that Filezilla has a boatload of great features, lacking AmazonS3 certainly doesn't make it crippleware.

Also I remember a time before Filezilla when anything but basic FTP was something you had to pay for. So part of me wants to give them a little more room to fund the project on this where I might be less forgiving elsewhere.

smaragdus wrote:
The installers offered for download at FileZilla web-site (https://filezilla-project.org/) are bundled, better get it from SourceForge (https://sourceforge.net/projects/filezilla/files/).

I'm actually okay with projects that provide a bundled version so long as a non-bundled version is also available. So for example, I'd be happy to support developers by getting a copy of some popular program I'm probably going to end up installing anyway (like Chrome or Acrobat). However, in this case it's not totally obvious and what's bundled with the program is unexplained, which makes me worry they're throwing in some garbage like OpenCandy or it's variants.

_________________
Supporting Net Neutrality - BattleForTheNet | Why this matters | More from EFF.org


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Protected by Anti-Spam ACP Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group