DMCsvEditor 2.9

Submit updates of portable freeware that are already listed in the database.
Post Reply
Message
Author
lautrepay
Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:31 am

DMCsvEditor 2.9

#1 Post by lautrepay »

DMCsvEditor is payware(?) now. A donation(?) of $ 5 is needed to get a download link to the new v2.9.
If someone discovers a link to the version 2.8, please report here.

Personally I still have doubts about the license used by the last version, because what you get in exchange for the payment is not a serial number but a simple link. But at the moment I'm not willing to pay to find out.
Anyway, I think that the developer made a risky move. In the case of a small application like this, with potential but with a lot to improve and without a large base of users, at least a trial version should be available.

User avatar
I am Baas
Posts: 4150
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:51 am

Re: DMCsvEditor 2.9

#2 Post by I am Baas »

Here at the official site you can download it for $5 donation.
It is still freeware/donationware if you download it elsewhere, is it not?


User avatar
I am Baas
Posts: 4150
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:51 am

Re: DMCsvEditor 2.9

#4 Post by I am Baas »

I don't know about Softpedia... the developer says it's donationware:

http://darhmedia.hu/iras-272-4-informac ... nware.html
http://darhmedia.hu/tartalom-12-donate.html

The developer links to a mirror @ http://www.freewarefiles.com/DMcsvEdito ... 16899.html

lautrepay
Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:31 am

Re: DMCsvEditor 2.9

#5 Post by lautrepay »

I am Baas wrote:The developer links to a mirror @ http://www.freewarefiles.com/DMcsvEdito ... 16899.html
Thanks, Baas! That's make (more) sense.
It's still a bit confusing the fact that the developer requires a donation to allow the download from his own site and at the same time provides a link to a mirror where the application can be downloaded for free.
But I downloaded the new version and (aparently, no license is specified) is still freeware, with no restrictions. No more doubts about it.

@joby_toss: It's extremely uncommon, but I think Softpedia made a mistake.

Post Reply