fre:ac 1.0.28

Submit updates of portable freeware that are already listed in the database.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
enzo
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 4:45 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

fre:ac 1.0.28

#1 Post by enzo » Sun Feb 19, 2017 11:24 am

Hi,

I released fre:ac 1.0.28 today. Just a small update, mainly for the new FLAC version and a fix related to cover art handling:
  • upgraded FLAC to version 1.3.2
  • updated Chinese (traditional) translation
  • configuration is now saved in freac.xml
  • fixed crash on some invalid cover art
fre:ac 1.0.28 on freac.org

Thanks,
Robert

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 7880
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: fre:ac 1.0.28

#2 Post by webfork » Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:59 pm

enzo wrote:I released fre:ac 1.0.28 today
Good stuff, thanks for letting us know.

EDIT: I noticed the current distro shrinks down to 3.72 megs when in .7z format versus the 5.74 megs for the ZIP distro. It's far from crucial and I imagine only sourceforge would care (thanks slightly less bandwidth) but I thought that might be interesting.
Supporting Net Neutrality - BattleForTheNet | Why this matters | More from EFF.org

User avatar
smaragdus
Posts: 2031
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:24 am
Location: Aeaea

Re: fre:ac 1.0.28

#3 Post by smaragdus » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:26 am

I still prefer the freak snapshots (currently using freac-20161129-windows-x64) not only because of the x64 version but mainly because the goodies they offer- Monkey's Audio, OptimFROG, Tom's lossless Audio Kompressor, WavPack, etc. When will these codecs be included in the stable branch?

By the way I liked the old name (BonkEnc) better.

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 7880
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: fre:ac 1.0.28

#4 Post by webfork » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:49 pm

smaragdus wrote:By the way I liked the old name (BonkEnc) better.
Probably not something he can go back on :)
Supporting Net Neutrality - BattleForTheNet | Why this matters | More from EFF.org

Post Reply