Page 1 of 2
DVDStyler [media authoring utility]
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:10 am
by griffithsdj
[
Mod note: the present is the official forum topic for DVDStyler:
http://www.portablefreeware.com/?id=455.
Subject edited; original was "
DVDStyler Portable Edition"]
DVDStylerPE is based on the DVD authoring system by Alex Thuering.
To install just run the .exe! Leaves no traces on the end user's system.
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2015 11:47 am
by Midas
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2015 11:06 am
by Ruby
DVDStyler has been portable (natively) for awhile now; there are 2 installers at the SourceForge site:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/dvdstyl ... dvdstyler/
DVDStyler.exe and DVDStylerPortable.exe
Both are actually installed and the ONLY difference is in the ISS installer script which foregoes the registry (Portable version) and instead creates an INI (DVDStyler.ini) with the following code:
Code: Select all
[Interface]
LanguageCode=en
ClearThumbnailCache=1
I have tested both install > copy folder to portable directory > uninstall
and
Extract (UniExtract) > copy contents of 'app' folder to portable directory > create DVDStyler.ini with code above
Resulting folders are identical
Launch DVDStyler.exe
~Ruby
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:47 pm
by billon
DVDStyler updated to 2.9.4, 2.9.5 and 2.9.6. Should entry be changed regarding Ruby's researchings?
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 6:36 am
by billon
webfork?
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:04 pm
by webfork
billon wrote:DVDStyler updated to 2.9.4, 2.9.5 and 2.9.6. Should entry be changed regarding Ruby's researchings?
billon wrote:webfork?
What were you looking for here? To change the topic name?
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 6:26 pm
by Checker
@webfork: The question is (and that's what billon is asking), should we switch the database entry from the PortableApps-version to the native version (which could be made portable according
Ruby's post)
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:53 pm
by webfork
Checker wrote:@webfork: The question is (and that's what billon is asking), should we switch the database entry from the PortableApps-version to the native version (which could be made portable according
Ruby's post)
Yes, based on the conclusions we came to back in
this thread, we try to list the natively portable versions first unless there's a problem with it. The short version is that some people prefer not to use wrapper programs and we're not really aiming to be a copy of PortableApps.com.
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 11:04 am
by Checker
And it's
done
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 1:10 pm
by webfork
Checker wrote:And it's
done
Great, thanks
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 4:05 pm
by Checker
webfork wrote:Great, thanks
Thanks for 'polishing' the entry to you, too
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 4:24 pm
by Ruby
What, no love for 'Ruby' - by the way; 'Rename the this file' ... Just sayin'...
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 4:35 pm
by webfork
Ruby wrote:What, no love for 'Ruby' - by the way
Yes of course. Thanks for investigating this.
Ruby wrote:'Rename the this file' ... Just sayin'...
?
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 4:41 pm
by Ruby
the or this; not both
Re: DVDStyler Portable Edition
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:09 am
by Checker
Ruby wrote:... What, no love for 'Ruby' ...
