TPFC Forums
https://www.portablefreeware.com/forums/
https://www.portablefreeware.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7601
Is it restriction time now or...................????guinness wrote:[Should it be added since there are so many integrity checkers?
I haven't added many applications to TPFC, so I wanted to know if users had any objections to this application being added to TPFC.There are a LOT of file verification / hashing programs here on the site, so it would be nice to have something the others don't. This one appears to have a broad algorithm support and a verification system. So this one looks like its worth the time.guinness wrote:No, not at all.
I think its great to have a unique database, instead of having the same program replicated many times with a different name! (no examples spring to mind!)
guinness wrote:OK, didn't see it the DB and it didn't have a separate forum topic, so I presumed it hadn't been added/suggested. Sorry.
Suggestion count, not testing count.I am Baas wrote:Sorry guinness but you will have to adjust your count... http://www.portablefreeware.com/forums/ ... 691#p24691
His response:is there a way to tweak FileVerifier++ to save individual hash files rather than a hash index file? For example, hashing:
file1.txt
file2.txt
... would create ...
file1.sfv
file2.sfv
I'm trying to put together hashes for individual files.
This can't be done with the GUI, but can be accomplished with FVC called from a script. There's a somewhat similar example that creates a hash file for each directory (as opposed to a single file). The example is the file fvc-batch.js which is located in the same directory as fvc.exe and fv.exe.