Page 2 of 2

Re: JavaRa

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 2:29 pm
by webfork

Re: JavaRa

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 4:21 pm
by guinness
It does require Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, but do people seriously care anymore since XP is out the door after April?

Re: JavaRa

Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:33 am
by joby_toss
I don't. :)

Re: JavaRa

Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 2:00 am
by guinness
joby_toss wrote:I don't. :)
Excellent answer. :mrgreen:

Re: JavaRa

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 6:06 am
by Midas
Related article -- and please do check its comments: http://www.techsupportalert.com/content ... a-read.htm...

Re: JavaRa

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:07 pm
by webfork
Midas wrote:Related article -- and please do check its comments: http://www.techsupportalert.com/content ... a-read.htm...
That's important so I guess I'll quote the text bit:
Java, on which many web sites and other programs rely, has been through many updates over the years. The version I installed this morning, for example, is 144. But in the past, updates to Java had a serious shortcoming. Although the new, secure version was installed correctly, the old insecure version was left in place. So if you're a regular Java user, your computer may still contain multiple insecure versions.

If you're worried that your computer might be at risk, see https://java.com/en/uninstall/ for details of how to download a free program that will remove all the old insecure versions of Java from your PC.