Process History

Submit portable freeware that you find here. It helps if you include information like description, extraction instruction, Unicode support, whether it writes to the registry, and so on.
Message
Author
User avatar
guinness
Posts: 4118
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:00 am
Contact:

Re: Process History

#16 Post by guinness »

Very nice link back.

janstetka
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 1:28 am

Re: Process History

#17 Post by janstetka »

Hi,

Combobox bug fixed on the 32bit viewer running under xp 8)

Also the 32bit build is now a zip file too so could the instructions be changed to reflect that please?

Thanks

User avatar
SYSTEM
Posts: 2043
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:19 am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: Process History

#18 Post by SYSTEM »

janstetka wrote: Also the 32bit build is now a zip file too so could the instructions be changed to reflect that please?

Thanks
Done. :)

BTW, consider using version numbering.
My YouTube channel | Release date of my 13th playlist: August 24, 2020

janstetka
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 1:28 am

Re: Process History

#19 Post by janstetka »

Another update. Multiple bugs fixed related to worker thread in processhistory.exe. Call it v1.0.2!

User avatar
SYSTEM
Posts: 2043
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:19 am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: Process History

#20 Post by SYSTEM »

janstetka wrote:Another update. Multiple bugs fixed related to worker thread in processhistory.exe. Call it v1.0.2!
Thank you. I have updated the entry. :) (The update hit the update frequency filter and therefore didn't bring Process History to the main page.)
My YouTube channel | Release date of my 13th playlist: August 24, 2020

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 10821
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Process History

#21 Post by webfork »

I noticed that this has been added to the following categories:
Security - Malware Detection;
System - Administration;
System - Monitoring;
System - Task Managers;
I'm thinking it's really just #3. Thoughts?

janstetka
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 1:28 am

Re: Process History

#22 Post by janstetka »

Which one do you think isn't relevant?

Its a system monitoring tool.

Can be used for malware detection if you know what you're looking for.

It doesn't actually administer anything but might be used by system administrators.

It's not designed to be a task manager replacement but instead showing what has gone on.

User avatar
webfork
Posts: 10821
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: US, Texas
Contact:

Re: Process History

#23 Post by webfork »

janstetka wrote:Which one do you think isn't relevant?

Can be used for malware detection if you know what you're looking for.

It doesn't actually administer anything but might be used by system administrators.

It's not designed to be a task manager replacement but instead showing what has gone on.
For malware detection, the problem is that we have visitors looking for a particular kind of software (e.g. Spybot) that track down malware. If that's clearly included in the functionality or help file, I can see adding it to Additional but not Primary features. Roughly the same goes for for system administration and task management.

janstetka
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 1:28 am

Re: Process History

#24 Post by janstetka »

OK change the categories.

User avatar
SYSTEM
Posts: 2043
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:19 am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: Process History

#25 Post by SYSTEM »

janstetka wrote:OK change the categories.
I have changed them.

I also removed mentions of Windows XP SP3 and Windows 7 SP1 from the Dependencies field. Required service packs aren't usually mentioned in entries.
My YouTube channel | Release date of my 13th playlist: August 24, 2020

janstetka
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 1:28 am

Re: Process History

#26 Post by janstetka »

Please could the link be changed to the http://code.google.com/p/processhistory/ site

The domain process-history.co.uk is due to cease tomorrow 11/06/14 and I'm looking into moving ISP so the hositng may go in the next couple of months too. As I don't earn any money from this project so it doesn't make any sense to be paying for a domain name and an ISP account with web space.

In the meantime the downloads PH64.exe and PH32.exe are still available at http://www.stetka.plus.com.

Ultimately google drive will be the download location as google code have depreciated adding new downloads.

Cheers

Jan

User avatar
I am Baas
Posts: 4150
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:51 am

Re: Process History

#27 Post by I am Baas »

The entry was updated.

janstetka
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 1:28 am

Re: Process History

#28 Post by janstetka »

Thanks.

janstetka
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 1:28 am

Re: Process History

#29 Post by janstetka »

The link "optional instructions available at developer site" needs updating to the http://www.stetka.plus.com/PHUser.html as it still points to the old domain.

User avatar
SYSTEM
Posts: 2043
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:19 am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: Process History

#30 Post by SYSTEM »

janstetka wrote:The link "optional instructions available at developer site" needs updating to the http://www.stetka.plus.com/PHUser.html as it still points to the old domain.
Done. :)
My YouTube channel | Release date of my 13th playlist: August 24, 2020

Post Reply