Curious - if you read the EULA (either from the installer or from the website linked in the first post), you see some standard text at the top. It begins with this:
Quote:
WYSIWYG BBCode Editor
Copyright (c) 2011, Shajul,
http://www.shajul.net/PROJECT HOME:
http://www.autohotkey.net/~shajul/bbcode-editor/All rights reserved.
If you scroll down under that, you see a section that begins:
Quote:
Jitbit Software Licence
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
WYSIWYG-BBCODE v1.6
WYSIWYG-BBCODE editor
Copyright (c) 2009, Jitbit Sotware,
http://www.jitbit.com/PROJECT HOME:
http://wysiwygbbcode.codeplex.com/All rights reserved.
It's a bit strange to see a program with two different sections in the EULA and apparently two different homepages. Reading the EULA further, the top section looks like a copy and paste of the bottom section, just with 'JitBit Software' removed. If you go to the project home as listed in the JitBit section, you see a program called 'WYSIWYGBBCode Editor' (same name as the one from the first post) - but at v1.6 (Not v1.0.1.1 as the program from the first post - admittedly the JitBit link does suggest that "Instead of downloading it is highly recommended getting the latest source codes, all the hottest fixes are there" so it would seem the 1.6 binary is a little out of date). Has the author of this new version just copied the code from the other version and packaged it as their own? Reading the original JitBit EULA, this would seem to be legal (as long as the copyright notice is included with the new binary), but it makes me uncomfortable IMHO.
_________________
Supporting PortableFreeware since...wait, what year is it again?
Zoom Player (customisable and flexible media player for Windows):
http://www.inmatrix.com/