Page 1 of 1

New operator in search to display private entries only

Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:43 pm
by Andrew Lee
You can now use the "[#]" operator to display private entries only.

eg. "[#]" will display all private entries

eg. "[#] clipboard" will display all private entries with the keyword "clipabord"

Re: New operator in search to display private entries only

Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:56 pm
by I am Baas
Excellent. Thanks.

Re: New operator in search to display private entries only

Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:06 pm
by I am Baas
Quickly went through the list of apps with 'Private' status... wtf, so much garbage in there. Seriously, who can remove apps from that list?

Re: New operator in search to display private entries only

Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 11:27 pm
by guinness
This is brilliant!

Some aren't all that bad which are not in the DB. The ones I have voted for have been 100% Portable & Stealth!

Re: New operator in search to display private entries only

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:38 am
by Hydaral
Excellent, something to do while I'm bored at work. :)

Re: New operator in search to display private entries only

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 5:56 am
by donald
Thanks Andrew.

Re: New operator in search to display private entries only

Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:53 pm
by guinness
Site Bug: I don't know if this has happened since you introduced the Private entries features, but if you check out BBox, it shows as NEW, but the version number has changed, so should this be UPDATE?

Re: New operator in search to display private entries only

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:44 pm
by Andrew Lee
As mentioned here, fixed.

Re: New operator in search to display private entries only

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 6:09 pm
by freakazoid
Missed this! Just gave it a test. Handy!

Re: New operator in search to display private entries only

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 6:21 pm
by freakazoid
Let's say I wanted to search private results for a given category, how would I do that?

Re: New operator in search to display private entries only

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:40 pm
by Andrew Lee
@freakazoid: Can't be done yet. Geez, there isn't even a way to search for _public_ entries within a category.

Anyway, I am still thinking of replacing categories with tags, so maybe after that we can introduce new search operators for tags.