It is currently Wed Sep 20, 2017 12:13 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Add function implemented
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:19 am
Posts: 1697
Location: Helsinki, Finland
I found a minor glitch.

Go here and click the "0" link (in "Popularity score (3/0)").

You will be redirected to the main page.

This only occurs if the scorelist is empty (that is, if no one has voted the application).

_________________
My YouTube channel | Release date of my tenth playlist: January 16, 2017


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Add function implemented
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 1:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:00 am
Posts: 4118
Confirmed! I experienced the same problem. But thinking about it with 0 points would result in a blank page anyway. So maybe Andrew has done this on purpose?!

_________________
Added 179 Applications: Portable


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Add function implemented
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Posts: 2150
It is intentiional. I have now modified it slightly to loop back to the app page instead since there is nothing to display.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Add function implemented
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:09 am
Posts: 3791
Location: Sol3
CodesAway wrote:
When I search for [@], I get all results. Is there a way to filter just the ones that are private (less than 10 votes) - I've been trying to figure this out for months.
[In P23466]
guinness wrote:
If you enter [@] and then select 'Options' to the right of the search box, from there you then choose the 'Results only:' dropdown box and select 'New only'

Problem though if the applications with less than 10points have been updated then they are classed as updated and not new, so they won't be in the list.
[In P23472]

Is there a better way to achieve what CodesAway requested? I have been wrapping my brain around this, too (to no avail, I must confess)...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Add function implemented
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Posts: 2150
Use the [#] operator.

It cannot be put in the search options directly because then it becomes public and search engines might pick them up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Add function implemented
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:09 am
Posts: 3791
Location: Sol3
Thanks a lot for that info, Andrew. 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Protected by Anti-Spam ACP Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group