Add function implemented

Changes, updates etc. related to this website will be posted here.

Moderators: usdcs, Andrew Lee, webfork

Message
Author
User avatar
SYSTEM
Posts: 1751
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:19 am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: Add function implemented

#121 Post by SYSTEM » Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:18 pm

I found a minor glitch.

Go here and click the "0" link (in "Popularity score (3/0)").

You will be redirected to the main page.

This only occurs if the scorelist is empty (that is, if no one has voted the application).
My YouTube channel | Release date of my 11th playlist: January 26, 2018

User avatar
guinness
Posts: 4118
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:00 am
Contact:

Re: Add function implemented

#122 Post by guinness » Tue Jan 04, 2011 1:51 am

Confirmed! I experienced the same problem. But thinking about it with 0 points would result in a blank page anyway. So maybe Andrew has done this on purpose?!
Added 179 Applications: Portable

User avatar
Andrew Lee
Posts: 2196
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Contact:

Re: Add function implemented

#123 Post by Andrew Lee » Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:12 pm

It is intentiional. I have now modified it slightly to loop back to the app page instead since there is nothing to display.

User avatar
Midas
Posts: 4065
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:09 am
Location: Sol3

Re: Add function implemented

#124 Post by Midas » Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:38 am

CodesAway wrote:When I search for [@], I get all results. Is there a way to filter just the ones that are private (less than 10 votes) - I've been trying to figure this out for months.
[In P23466]
guinness wrote:If you enter [@] and then select 'Options' to the right of the search box, from there you then choose the 'Results only:' dropdown box and select 'New only'

Problem though if the applications with less than 10points have been updated then they are classed as updated and not new, so they won't be in the list.
[In P23472]

Is there a better way to achieve what CodesAway requested? I have been wrapping my brain around this, too (to no avail, I must confess)...

User avatar
Andrew Lee
Posts: 2196
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Contact:

Re: Add function implemented

#125 Post by Andrew Lee » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:01 pm

Use the [#] operator.

It cannot be put in the search options directly because then it becomes public and search engines might pick them up.

User avatar
Midas
Posts: 4065
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:09 am
Location: Sol3

Re: Add function implemented

#126 Post by Midas » Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:18 am

Thanks a lot for that info, Andrew. 8)

Post Reply