It is currently Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:15 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Posts: 2150
Quote:
There seems to be a bug/change with the text box's, any next line spacing will simple be wrapped after your press submit. e.g. http://www.portablefreeware.com/index.php?id=132 'Another alternative is X-Firefox.' used to be on the next line down.


Bug fixed.

Quote:
In terms of the progress of this site you seem to have made some very radical changes (for the better), but will you still keep the submission process the same? Or will you be looking at implementing a new submission system?


As I mentioned before, I am currently working on a new submission system that is more democracy than dictatorship. The group edit function is but a stone in the foundation for this new system. For more information, see this thread.

Quote:
Also what should be done about the entries that have Geocities websites and are no longer down-loadable via 3rd party download sites?


We should make direct download available for these entries. What are some of these apps that you know of?

Quote:
When using the search function on the homepage, if more than 5 results are returned the "Page: 1 2 etc" links do not contain the search term (the ?q= element of the URL).


Fixed.

Quote:
I also notice that the page item is not bounds-checked. Follow this link for an example: http://www.portablefreeware.com/index.php?q=notepad&p=5


Fixed.

Quote:
EDIT: As a side note... has the link anchor been removed from the logo image? Or am I only imagining it was ever there? It makes sense to have that as a permanent link back to the home page, in my opinion.


This was never there (only in the forum page), but now that you mentioned it, I think it's a good idea, so I have added the link. Thanks!

Quote:
EDIT 2: Having just used the function, I also note a minor typo. "Members should test new versions for portability being posting an update, unless it's a very minor update" should probably read "Members should test new versions for portability before posting an update, unless it's a very minor update". Sorry for nit-picking.


Fixed.

Thanks everyone!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Posts: 2150
Just found another bug. Backslashes appear to be filtered out in the text boxes. I will only have time later in the day to work on squashing it, so in the mean time, use forward slashes instead.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:45 pm
Posts: 910
Hey Andrew,

I've got a text field request for TPFC listings.

Checker is one of our most active forum posters and he does a valiant job at notifying everyone about new versions.
One of the things he does best is add a "What's new" block to his forum posts.

Since the new system is designed to stop these "new version" posts in the forums, as per discussion in this thread, viewtopic.php?f=8&t=5609, maybe add a "What's new" field for TPFC listings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:00 pm
Posts: 1615
Location: Ingolstadt [DE]
@ freakazoid: Thank you !

@ Andrew Lee: In this case I completely agree with ashghost.
ashghost wrote: "...but I think it would just add more clutter than utility ..."

In my opinion the TPFC-database is the wrong place to add this.
I thought that a forum for updates would be the right place for posting that kind of information.
But maybe I was wrong ... because you seem to dislike this kind of traffic at this forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:45 pm
Posts: 910
I guess adding a "What's New" field will clutter the database; I guess I could always just click on the software's website link.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:00 pm
Posts: 1615
Location: Ingolstadt [DE]
... and there you will find new versions, too ;-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Posts: 2150
Quote:
Just found another bug. Backslashes appear to be filtered out in the text boxes. I will only have time later in the day to work on squashing it, so in the mean time, use forward slashes instead.


I have fixed this bug.

Quote:
I already deleted more than 350 of my postings to save space for "more complex discussions"


I think "What's new" qualifies as more complex discussion :D I was more referring to those one-liner posts like "XXX has been updated to V4.3".

Anyway, I think having a "What's new" field to go with each database entry is a better arrangement than having them separately in the forum (or posting them in the comments section, like what some other folks do). We can all agree with that. It shouldn't be too difficult to display the field under a collapsible section so that it will not clutter the main page too much. What do you think?

In the long term, we should definitely have a separate link that goes to the changelog that displays the edit history together with the "What's new" field (one row for each version).

Until I add the new field, you guys are welcome to post the "What's new" to the update forum as usual. It shouldn't take me too long to add the code. Will keep you posted.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:45 pm
Posts: 910
[quote="Andrew Lee"]In the long term, we should definitely have a separate link that goes to the changelog that displays the edit history together with the "What's new" field (one row for each version).[/quote]

Sounds good to me!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:37 pm
Posts: 39
Location: Canada
I think adding a "What changed" section is a great idea. Personally i much prefer to get all my information from one spot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:14 am
Posts: 562
Location: knoxville TN USA
I noticed something today, some perhaps a lot of applications have outdated comments.

Example [url]http://www.portablefreeware.com/?id=483[/url]

The first comment [quote]CD: Why use anything else? Under 150 kb. No registry entries. Reliable, low resource usage, no spyware/virus, skinnable. Does exactly what it is supposed to. [2006-03-24 13:23][/quote]

The comments that are out of date and uninformative about the application and alternatives could also be a point of editing.

Since the database includes just the latest version that is acceptable, the entries that no longer apply might be removed or hidden.

Just my 2 cents but these are potentially misleading to some (when not specifically contradicted in the entry itself), and otherwise pointless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Posts: 2150
Quote:
Anyway, I think having a "What's new" field to go with each database entry is a better arrangement than having them separately in the forum (or posting them in the comments section, like what some other folks do). We can all agree with that. It shouldn't be too difficult to display the field under a collapsible section so that it will not clutter the main page too much. What do you think?


I have added this new field (we should call this the "Checker" field, since it's inspired by Checker's unparalleled work :D)

Quote:
The comments that are out of date and uninformative about the application and alternatives could also be a point of editing.


I remove spam and non-informative comments on a day-to-day basis, but there is a lot of gray area, so a lot of cases are not clear-cut. If you feel a comment ought to be removed, either PM me, post on the discussion forum, or post your own comment there.

In the example that you pointed out, the next comment by Pepe immediately corrects the outdated error in the previous comment by CD, which is great!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:00 pm
Posts: 1615
Location: Ingolstadt [DE]
@ Andrew Lee: Thank you ... for this "Checker"-field !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:45 pm
Posts: 910
Thanks Andrew!

And thanks Checker! I see you've been busy! :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:38 am
Posts: 890
Location: Kce,PL
I'm experiencing some date issues:
Today I updated foxit reader entry (corrected license: it's adware).
Result:
[quote]Updated by m^(2) on 26th November 2009[/quote]
Strange. It's not the date set on my computer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Editing function implemented
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Posts: 2150
Quote:
I'm experiencing some date issues:
Today I updated foxit reader entry (corrected license: it's adware).
Result:
Quote:
Updated by m^(2) on 26th November 2009

Strange. It's not the date set on my computer.


Fixed! Thanks for letting me know.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Protected by Anti-Spam ACP Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group