Two new features

Changes, updates etc. related to this website will be posted here.
Message
Author
User avatar
Andrew Lee
Posts: 2209
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Contact:

Two new features

#1 Post by Andrew Lee » Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:54 pm

Two new features have been implemented:

1) The "Alternatives" field request by spicydog is now online. For examples, see this and this.

2) guiness wants a way to count his submissions with the new website design. He can easily do it now with:

"[@guiness]" = return all guiness' submissions
"[#guiness]" = return all guiness' private submissions

Here's a summary of _all_ the special search commands currently available:

"[@]" = return all public + private entries
"[#]" = return all private entries only
"[username]" = return all username's favorites
"[@username]" = return all username's public + private submissions
"[#username]" = return all username's private submissions

lautrepay
Posts: 700
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:31 am

Re: Two new features

#2 Post by lautrepay » Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:21 pm

Great! Thanks!
Is it already implemented? I get "guiness's submissions (0)" when I search for "[@guiness]".
If I search for "[@lautrepay]" I get the entries that I recently updated.

User avatar
Andrew Lee
Posts: 2209
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Contact:

Re: Two new features

#3 Post by Andrew Lee » Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:25 pm

Is it already implemented? I get "guiness's submissions (0)" when I search for "[@guiness]".
If I search for "[@lautrepay]" I get the entries that I recently updated.
Should be working now. Please try again.

User avatar
tproli
Posts: 1165
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:14 am
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: Two new features

#4 Post by tproli » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:36 am

Perhaps this block could be added to the Detailed Search page, under the Search button.

Code: Select all

"[@]" = return all public + private entries
"[#]" = return all private entries only
"[username]" = return all username's favorites
"[@username]" = return all username's public + private submissions
"[#username]" = return all username's private submissions

User avatar
Firewrath
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:36 pm

Re: Two new features

#5 Post by Firewrath » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:56 am

Andrew Lee wrote:
Is it already implemented? I get "guiness's submissions (0)" when I search for "[@guiness]".
Should be working now. Please try again.
I'm getting this too. Maybe guiness has too many submissions for the system to handle. ;)

But if I do "[@Firewrath]", it seems to work. O_o
(Not that I've submitted much >.>)
"It's not that I'm Evil, just that I'm unwillingly Good."
-Stolen, but oh so fitting. ^-^

Note: It might take me a while to reply to any post or comments due to offline reasons.
So if I don't reply or miss a question, this is why.

User avatar
guinness
Posts: 4118
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:00 am
Contact:

Re: Two new features

#6 Post by guinness » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:23 am

It's because my user name is guinness! People always forget the second n. :mrgreen:

Thanks for adding Andrew, I had no idea you had added 288+ applications to the database.
Added 179 Applications: Portable

User avatar
Firewrath
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:36 pm

Re: Two new features

#7 Post by Firewrath » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:44 am

Rofl... ^-^;;

I blame Andrew! I just used what he had! ;)
Andrew Lee wrote: "[@guiness]" = return all guiness' submissions
"[#guiness]" = return all guiness' private submissions
;)
"It's not that I'm Evil, just that I'm unwillingly Good."
-Stolen, but oh so fitting. ^-^

Note: It might take me a while to reply to any post or comments due to offline reasons.
So if I don't reply or miss a question, this is why.

lautrepay
Posts: 700
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:31 am

Re: Two new features

#8 Post by lautrepay » Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:02 am

Andrew Lee wrote:
Is it already implemented? I get "guiness's submissions (0)" when I search for "[@guiness]".
If I search for "[@lautrepay]" I get the entries that I recently updated.
Should be working now. Please try again.
Working fine now, thanks!
Firewrath wrote:Rofl... ^-^;;

I blame Andrew! I just used what he had! ;)
Andrew Lee wrote: "[@guiness]" = return all guiness' submissions
"[#guiness]" = return all guiness' private submissions
;)
Lol I did the same

User avatar
Midas
Posts: 4195
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:09 am
Location: Sol3

Re: Two new features

#9 Post by Midas » Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:08 am

Great features. TPFC keeps getting better. 8)

lautrepay
Posts: 700
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:31 am

Re: Two new features

#10 Post by lautrepay » Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:16 am

And who are the Top 10?
Some candidates: Andrew Lee, guinness, Fluffy, I am Baas, Checker, AlephX, joby_toss, technicolordreamcoat.

User avatar
Checker
Posts: 1624
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:00 pm
Location: Ingolstadt [DE]

Re: Two new features

#11 Post by Checker » Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:34 am

Great additions :!: ... Thanks Andrew :D

User avatar
Checker
Posts: 1624
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:00 pm
Location: Ingolstadt [DE]

Re: Two new features

#12 Post by Checker » Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:09 am

If I search with [@Checker] the entries for

- CurrProcess [25]
- ExeInfo [15]
- Access PassView [11]
- Celestia Portable [20]

are flagged "Private" :?:
Last edited by Checker on Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Andrew Lee
Posts: 2209
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:19 am
Contact:

Re: Two new features

#13 Post by Andrew Lee » Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:39 pm

tproli wrote:Perhaps this block could be added to the Detailed Search page, under the Search button.
But these are features I don't want the casual passerby to use.
Checker wrote:If I search with [@Checker] the entries for

- CurrProcess [20]
- ExeInfo [15]
- Access PassView [11]
- Celestia Portable [20]

are flagged "Private" :?:
These are unflagged, no? Public entries that are older than 3 months are unflagged. Private entries will always be marked "Private", regardless of age.

User avatar
Checker
Posts: 1624
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:00 pm
Location: Ingolstadt [DE]

Re: Two new features

#14 Post by Checker » Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:56 am

Andrew Lee wrote:These are unflagged, no? Public entries that are older than 3 months are unflagged. Private entries will always be marked "Private", regardless of age.
No, they are flagged "Private", but they shouldn't, that's why I added the voting points.

If you search them direct, every thing is o.k., but if you search with "[@Checker]" (selection: 5 per page) you will find them on page 13 all flagged with "Private" :!:

User avatar
SYSTEM
Posts: 1764
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:19 am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: Two new features

#15 Post by SYSTEM » Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:59 am

Checker wrote:
Andrew Lee wrote:These are unflagged, no? Public entries that are older than 3 months are unflagged. Private entries will always be marked "Private", regardless of age.
No, they are flagged "Private", but they shouldn't, that's why I added the voting points.

If you search them direct, every thing is o.k., but if you search with "[@Checker]" (selection: 5 per page) you will find them on page 13 all flagged with "Private" :!:
Confirmed. In addition, I found another problem: the list includes InjectedDLL which is a private entry. However, it's flagged as "Updated".
My YouTube channel | Release date of my 11th playlist: January 26, 2018

Post Reply