JaunePE 0.1.4 Bugs

Message

Zach Thibeau · #31 Post by **Zach Thibeau** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:30 am

redllar wrote: 1) You're not running with a JPE 014 dll
2) You're not running with the JPE runtime ini that you think you are
3) The JPE runtime dlls are not getting injected into the process

Yes I am using the 014 dll it's just not registering on my laptop or desktop. but with the 011 dll it registers fine :S

Chris · #32 Post by **Chris** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:17 am

thibeaz, do you happened to use non-English XP on your PC? And what about your parents' computer?

I don't really think language is the culprit, but just in case to make sure.

Zach Thibeau · #33 Post by **Zach Thibeau** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:19 am

Chris wrote:thibeaz, do you happened to use non-English XP on your PC? And what about your parents' computer?

I don't really think language is the culprit, but just in case to make sure.

English-US on all computers

Chris · #34 Post by **Chris** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:23 am

English-US on all computers

Okay, that confirms it. Language has nothing to do with it.

Zach Thibeau · #35 Post by **Zach Thibeau** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:37 am

Chris wrote:
English-US on all computers
Okay, that confirms it. Language has nothing to do with it.

Well if it isn't the language then I don't know what

Chris · #36 Post by **Chris** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:49 am

if it isn't the language then I don't know what

I don't know either, but it seems the processor. I only have Pentium-4 HT 3.01 GHz, with it JauntePE works wonderfully. I hope redllar will come up with something, or maybe he would try to rebuild the 0.1.1 again and recheck maybe a feature or something that creates this problem.

BAHeath · #37 Post by **BAHeath** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:20 pm

redllar, Thanks for the updated jauntePE.dll unfortunately it behaved the same as the other 0.1.4 versions.

Zach Thibeau · #38 Post by **Zach Thibeau** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:07 pm

Chris wrote:
if it isn't the language then I don't know what
I don't know either, but it seems the processor. I only have Pentium-4 HT 3.01 GHz, with it JauntePE works wonderfully. I hope redllar will come up with something, or maybe he would try to rebuild the 0.1.1 again and recheck maybe a feature or something that creates this problem.

Well for one thing JauntePE will make the log (that redllar told me to create with the %appname%_jauntePE.ini file) on my parents intel computer for 0.1.4 but not on any of my amd computers

Local · #39 Post by **Local** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:53 pm

I tried the latest 014 dll posted here on my AMD machines Thibeaz but they're still redirecting fine.

The log is being produced, it says that everything was being directed as I set it.
I tried with file system and Reg and with Reg redirection alone.

I tested with Proc Explorer and both Dll's were running with the app too.

If you think it may still be a hardware problem have you checked what chipsets you are using?
I'm not sure if the drivers for them could be interfering in the new builds.

Both of mine are running off ATI motherboards so I can't compare results.

Chris · #40 Post by **Chris** » Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:18 am

Feeling curious with the infamous bug, I decided to check on my friend's laptop Intel Pentium M 1.60GHz 221 MHz 1GB RAM. JauntePE works normally, I tested using Process Explorer and ObjectDock.

Turning off and on for file redirection when testing with Process Explorer also works good.
If it's not because of processor, what else? Maybe it's software. If only thibeaz would make an image of his or her current OS and then reapply clean OS, to see if the problem still exists.

Just kidding...

Zach Thibeau · #41 Post by **Zach Thibeau** » Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:42 am

lol I did a clean wipe of the os already and the problem still exists for me

redllar · #42 Post by **redllar** » Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:05 pm

BAHeath wrote:redllar, Thanks for the updated jauntePE.dll unfortunately it behaved the same as the other 0.1.4 versions.

thibeaz wrote:lol I did a clean wipe of the os already and the problem still exists for me

EDIT: removed link.

BAHeath · #43 Post by **BAHeath** » Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:45 pm

Well that one did it... it worked perfectly! I even ran it through upx... No problems.

Zach Thibeau · #44 Post by **Zach Thibeau** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:32 am

redllar wrote: Okay guys, give this one a try. I think this is it.

Problem Fixed it works on my laptop now

I haven't tested my desktop because I am away on vacation but if it works on my laptop it should work on my desktop

redllar · #45 Post by **redllar** » Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:38 am

Thanks for testing guys. I'll send out 015 with a few more changes as soon as I get it tested.